lopmotr

11 ms·

1.
by lopmotr 6y ago
Unlikely. It also directly says 40 minute battery life. If changes extended it, it would be unlimited.
2.
by lopmotr 6y ago
Although reducing speed and fuel usage reduces fuel costs, it increases fixed costs (you need more ships for the same throughput) as well as operating costs like crew. It might turn out to still be more expensive in the end. Then there&#x27
3.
by lopmotr 6y ago
I don't understand either. Somebody else made the same comment but typical electric cars still have diffs. Examples include Chevy Volt, Nissan Leaf, and Tesla Model 3, Tesla Model S. Where are the electric cars with independent left&#x
4.
by lopmotr 6y ago
The alt and title text of the first image seems to be AI generated: "Line, Grey, Black-and-white, Exercise equipment, Monochrome, Machine, Monochrome photography, Barbell, Circle, Gas, " Other non-car images on the site have text
5.
by lopmotr 6y ago
Do any site operators actually block non-Google search engine crawlers because being listed DDG/Bing/etc isn't worth the extra cost of serving the crawler? It sound a bit ridiculous unless they actually don't want to be
6.
by lopmotr 6y ago
I expect it's like how stamp collecting used to be the world's most popular hobby. It might not have been anybody's favorite activity, but it was commonly accessible to everyone. They call these things "lowest common den
7.
by lopmotr 6y ago
You know what's worse than aspirations to become a celebrity? No aspirations at all. I know people like that. They just seem to see the future as a regular life with nothing particularly to do in it except exist and perform normal regu
8.
by lopmotr 6y ago
Which all doesn't matter at all because it'll recover afterwards. Framing it as an ecological disaster is just a way to engage all the people who are prone to worrying about the environment.
9.
by lopmotr 6y ago
Except that they're not independent and that looks like a fact which the model discovered.
10.
by lopmotr 6y ago
Seems like an overhyped danger. Does anyone actually think that? You would have to not even know that the purpose of a language model is to model human language. But if that's the level of your understanding, why would you select a lan
11.
by lopmotr 6y ago
Who cares about ML when we already do that: https://www.slideshare.net/yuyomajadero/jobs-occupations-pro...
12.
by lopmotr 6y ago
Sure, TIV has appearing weak and BDP has rages but since you didn't state that explicitly, I wondered if you'd omitted it because it wasn't present in those people you knew. I kind of wonder though, if the way we end up class
13.
by lopmotr 6y ago
It's not clear that feeling like a victim is ever a good approach to life and maybe a bit of bludgeoning would help in the long run. No matter how bad things are because of someone harming you, it can be just as bad because of nobody&#
14.
by lopmotr 6y ago
Sounds more like incels than SJWs. SJWs are often not members of their victim classes themselves.
15.
by lopmotr 6y ago
> Weak, soft, approachable in the beginning but, becomes silently more dominant and sucking your energy for their survival. If you cannot regenerate fast enough, they throw you to the side to find their new victim. That sounds a lot like
16.
by lopmotr 6y ago
You can't just declare it. You have to have the political power for people to respect it. Even after Xi became president, he didn't have that power until he purged his opponents. Trump certainly never will.
17.
by lopmotr 6y ago
I think these days you cannot operate a crowded theatre where people will get trampled if they're panicked by the thought of a fire. At least I hope not. That's the real problem with yelling fire. But people should stop using that
18.
by lopmotr 6y ago
Yes but the difference shrinks when all the private entities that dominate the communication between people impose the same censorship and competition is effectively prevented by network effects. It's more of an anti-trust problem. Nob
19.
by lopmotr 6y ago
The bigger conversation isn't really about YouTube, it's that some people want these ideas suppressed from everywhere and some people don't. Youtube just happens to be more flexible than the government, but don't think f
20.
by lopmotr 6y ago
I used to live in China in the pre-Trump days when most westerners believed in free speech. Sometimes I would hear about "draconian" Chinese censorship. It seemed obviously bad by western standards. For example, they would prohibi
21.
by lopmotr 6y ago
If it wasn't blurry, it would be obvious what it was, and hence not a UFO. The extra-terrestrial idea is a bit far fetched, but generally, they're just objects/phenomena that can't be identified, not necessarily exotic.
22.
by lopmotr 6y ago
They do it to blacks and whites just about as much as each other. You don't hear about the random people much, just the special cases that are suitable for the news. Don't mistake press coverage for the actual distribution.
23.
by lopmotr 6y ago
I just skimmed the paper but I don't see what's novel here. Engineers design clips all the time. My company produces off the shelf software to help them to this - modelling the geometry, friction and elasticity. It looks like this
24.
by lopmotr 6y ago
It's not glass wool. It's essentially the same stuff duvets are made from. Very comfortable actually! But maybe has some special fire retarding additive or something - I don't know. Just looking up the product now, the brochu
25.
by lopmotr 6y ago
For elegance, it's a bit artificial, being tied to the technology of things that use pixels and popular software that zooms in on pixelated images as a grid of single-color squares. Maybe some unintelligible character-like symbols woul
26.
by lopmotr 6y ago
Huh? Because conservatives don't like safety? Or they like dishonest business practices?
27.
by lopmotr 6y ago
It's funny to think "obviously polyethylene is flammable, how did nobody notice" then realize my own house has expanded polystyrene and polyester fiber batts insulation under the floor. I wondered about fire risk but saw some
28.
by lopmotr 6y ago
Not at all. Investors do this all the time to gain an edge over each other. It's ethical because they're actually providing a service by moving the stock price towards a more fair value so subsequent investors don't get rippe
29.
by lopmotr 6y ago
Why do you think they treat religions as being as important as race but not other beliefs like political, conspiracy theories, or certain other religions? BBC certainly isn't doing much to damp down political hatred so what's thei
30.
by lopmotr 6y ago
I think the problem is that most of the content is general subjective anti-Trump ranting, and not specific to this incident.

More ›