Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
longstaff2009
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
31.
▲
Hyperledger Explorer (A Poor Mans Etherscan) Quick Start with Screenshots
(medium.com)
2 points
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
|
0 comments
32.
▲
Someone Just Paid 2,100 ETH to Send 0.1 ETH – Looks Like a Config Error
(medium.com)
1 points
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
|
0 comments
33.
▲
JP Morgan Is the First Bank to Launch a Stablecoin
(hackernoon.com)
1 points
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
|
0 comments
34.
▲
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
I had missed these, thanks for sharing
35.
▲
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
Not being a holder of a unique resource is a good point. Google do have the mind share though, can you imagine trying to explain to Aunty Robyn that you have to type duckduckgo.com into the search bar now? and that she cant google it anymor
36.
▲
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
I like this phrase a lot :)
37.
▲
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
it was, and it sent a strong message to other big companies that Google doesn't care who you are. This is Google's playground and if you want to stay in the search index then you play by Google's rules.
38.
▲
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
For a token fine I would agree. If the scale of the fines where to increase from a level that can be written off as the cost of doing business to something more damaging, I think that could change things. Particularly as we are seeing a ris
39.
▲
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
Maybe, but if the French government where to send the army into an American companies datacenter, would America stand by? Particularly if tech lobbyists had been contributing heavily to political campaign donations?
40.
▲
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
That would be a big gamble for each member country to make.
41.
▲
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
You are right, it should say "act in the interest of" rather than "make money".
42.
▲
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
Yes ! At some point the cost of the reputation hit becomes less than the value of the fine. Google removed 'Don't be evil' from its code of conduct last year. Hopefully not a sign of things to come
43.
▲
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
I would call it a thought experiment rather than a power fantasy, but sure. Would it be a thread to US national security in the same way it could be to France? It might depend how the President at the time is and where their campaign fundin
44.
▲
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
So I think that is why the fine is 0.05% of global revenue instead of the full 4% that can be enforced under GDPR. Both the government and Google can spin it as a win. But say instead France asks for 4% of global revenue, and there are rumb
45.
▲
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
maybe, but when it comes to calling bluffs it would be much harder for the government to sustain continued denial of services than for Google et al to keep the case in court
46.
▲
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
maybe for some cases, but then there are the government and industry bodies that have exabytes of data stored. if Amazon wont provide access to snowmobile to you it becomes problematic
47.
▲
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
in the hypothetical scenario where France tries to enforce a huge fine and Google says no thanks, France pushes and then Google turns off service it would be crippling. Google has a lot of power in that sort of negotiation. Which is why I t
48.
▲
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
On what grounds? They would just be changing their business model
49.
▲
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
I think the extent of that leverage is not well understood. It's like AMI trying to blackmail Jeff Bezos, but having all of their sites hosted with AWS .... What happens when it makes business sense for Google, Amazon, Apple and Facebo
50.
▲
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
I did a few migration projects when I worked at the Discovery Channel and they took months of planning to ensure continuation of services.
51.
▲
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
for consumers maybe, but if you don't have access to your data its problematic. for business and government departments it could be crippling
52.
▲
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
Google has flexed its power and punished big companies for not playing nice in the past http://edition.cnn.com/2006/BUSINESS/02/07/google/
53.
▲
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
if Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft formed a union of sorts it would be hard to move away from
54.
▲
What happens when Google says “we aren’t going to pay your fines”?
(medium.com)
35 points
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
|
76 comments
55.
▲
Screenshots from making garbage code fast enough to feature on SharkTank
(hackernoon.com)
2 points
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
|
0 comments
56.
▲
What you need to know about Privacy and HyPerledger Fabric
(hackernoon.com)
1 points
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
|
0 comments
57.
▲
“Deadbeat Debtors Near Me?” China Has a WeChat App for That
(hackernoon.com)
4 points
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
|
0 comments
58.
▲
My framework for how to look at the future of blockchain
(medium.com)
3 points
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
|
0 comments
59.
▲
HyPerledger Fabric – the 20 most important terms made simple
(hackernoon.com)
5 points
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
|
0 comments
60.
▲
See people’s faces from miles away in the 195 gigapixel photo of Shanghai
(medium.com)
3 points
by
longstaff2009
8y ago
|
0 comments
More ›