loikujhygthj

5 ms·

1.
by loikujhygthj 16y ago
True, all they rely on BT for is the bit that's completely impossible for them to get anywhere else or duplicate.
2.
by loikujhygthj 16y ago
Or they can just remove all google's ads and replace them with their own. This is what BT (the UK's effectively monopoly phone co) did. The introduce a system (phorn) that monitored all your browsing and replaced the ads with ones by it's c
3.
by loikujhygthj 16y ago
But they all buy the ADSL access from BT and are basically just billing operations - if BT chooses to implement a pay per content they will have to pass that on. If you have a cable connection then it's probably owned by Sky (murdoch) alrea
4.
by loikujhygthj 16y ago
The people that could afford a site aren't the people that answer questions for free. The main problem was that there was no way of charging the people who asked questions - who were the only ones likely to want to pay.
5.
by loikujhygthj 16y ago
$50 for basic cable here, another $50 for extras (discovery channel and comedy network) HD and movies get a lot more expensive. Then sport - ouch. There is only one cable provider and it has a monopoly. I just watched TV on the net after t
6.
by loikujhygthj 16y ago
And of course a 60year old might question something they found on facebook/google - whereas a 6year old will be quite happy to believe it, if it's what their bosses want to hear.
7.
by loikujhygthj 16y ago
>//does exactly what you think Bring the database to a grinding halt when it tries to service 1000s of request for different rows in the same table at the same time in parallel rather than just access each line in order and sum them?