logscore

31 ms·

1.
by logscore 2y ago
Our primary advantage right now is extensibility and simplicity. We are working with users that want to implement features that cant be generated with current generators and we enable them to implement those. Our generator does work for tho
2.
Show HN: Borea: generate typesafe SDKs from OpenAPI(borea.dev)
4 points by logscore 2y ago|4 comments
3.
Ask HN: Is there a dev friendly alternative to Gmail, Outlook, etc.?
3 points by logscore 2y ago|3 comments
4.
by logscore 2y ago
THis is very similar to what Oxide.computer has done. They wrote their own tooling to go from Rust API to spec to Rust and TS client. Very specific to their use case, but I think its the right approach. If something is wrong in the client,
5.
by logscore 2y ago
You can write OpenAPI in JSON, which can help a bit with encompassing the complex and frankly fractured ecosystem of OpenAPI. I have found that the tooling tends to have the problem of not knowing how to catch edge cases like webhooks, webs
6.
Show HN: An open source generator for complex SDKs(github.com)
5 points by logscore 2y ago|0 comments
7.
by logscore 2y ago
Yes, that was what I'm referencing. I understand these engines have their own full SDK for developing with the engine, but I'm curious about the external ecosystem/integrations/libraries. It isn't a space I'm s
8.
Ask HN: Who Uses SDKs for Unity/Unreal/Godot?
9 points by logscore 2y ago|4 comments
9.
Ask HN: Where do SDK generators break down?
1 points by logscore 2y ago|0 comments