logicallee

49 ms·

1. 781.▲
   by logicallee 4y ago

   I agree - the pauses in the first sample called "Narration" are incredibly accurate and pleasant to listen to. As a developer, can you tell the difference between "Narration" and the human speaker? What can we listen for
2. 782.▲
   by logicallee 4y ago

   Did you find the whole clip it was in convincing? For me, I didn't even notice the breath but the entire second and third clip felt obviously AI-generated. But the first clip sounded absolutely real (maybe with some compression artif
3. 783.▲
   by logicallee 4y ago

   By the way if anyone is in this thread due to working on AI speech synthesis for any company, I am interested in AI as well as audio production and I would love to talk about joining the team as an AI researcher. Just send me some mail, my
4. 784.▲
   by logicallee 4y ago

   Interestingly, some of the robot styles take a very obvious and dramatic fake breath. I say "fake" since a robot doesn't need to breathe and it's not exactly considered a phoneme. The fake breaths don't really make
5. 785.▲
   by logicallee 4y ago

   Let's talk about this "Narrative" example. When I listened to it, my first impression was that it must be the real actor they included for comparison purposes but that they failed to label it correctly. I thought it is not ma
6. 786.▲
   by logicallee 4y ago

   Thanks for all that. Finally I got the headat approach faster by removing shuffling, removing the range operation (just filling a list with ten million zeroes using mylist = [0] * 10000000), and hardcoding the constant for the size of the t
7. 787.▲
   by logicallee 4y ago

   True but it was delicious.
8. 788.▲
   by logicallee 4y ago

   For anyone who hasn't been to New York this is what a slice looked like at my local pizza place down the street: https://imgur.com/a/9wRM859 Delicious.
9. 789.▲
   by logicallee 4y ago

   I tried removing the shuffle and got these results: Finished 100 runs of popping from 10000000 elements in 208.10663533210754 seconds. Finished 100 runs of manually 'popping' via headat tracking from 10000000 e
10. 790.▲
    by logicallee 4y ago

    Ah, good point! I wonder what happens if I remove the shuffle...? :D
11. 791.▲
    Show HN: Manually tracking a subscript isn't any faster than pop() in Python(github.com)

    2 points by logicallee 4y ago|6 comments
12. 792.▲
    by logicallee 4y ago

    Great - let them know you think so and would like to keep the free version we're all using now free.
13. 793.▲
    by logicallee 4y ago

    Having Bing be a paying implentation while continuing to make ChatGPT available for free is a great step toward keeping it free and available to everyone.
14. 794.▲
    by logicallee 4y ago

    Partnering with Microsoft as an investor and/or revenue stream is a great step. Microsoft haven't ruined Github so far (since buying them), run hands-down the best code editor (VSCode) and also created the amazing TypeScript langu
15. 795.▲
    Tell HN: ChatGPT Should Stay Free

    1 points by logicallee 4y ago|8 comments
16. 796.▲
    by logicallee 4y ago

    (Not OP.) You got downvoted, but you motivated me to at least run it through an OCR scanner. if anyone wants it here you go - https://github.com/robss2020/OCR-furby-source-code This is just the PDF run through OCR. I
17. 797.▲
    by logicallee 4y ago

    The parent comment by al2o3cr does not show general intelligence, by making an inappropriate comparison with parrots that occasionally produce a human sentence. While superficially similar, ChatGPT's demonstrations of intelligence incl
18. 798.▲
    by logicallee 4y ago

    My hot take: The commentators in this thread regurgitate the same statements without adjusting for new situations and experiences. Nobody in the thread has any form of general intelligence. Each person is an advanced text processor outputin
19. 799.▲
    by logicallee 4y ago

    ChatGPT presents as though it has imposter syndrome. It identifies as just a large language model that is unable to do certain things. In fact, it regularly does many of the things it identifies as not being able to do if you ask it about i
20. 800.▲
    by logicallee 4y ago

    I hereby endorse ChatGPT as a limited form of AGI. It can complete a variety of novel cognitive tasks (example: judging texts and proposals) often enough that it meets my personal requirements for this. My opinion is that the definitions w
21. 801.▲
    by logicallee 4y ago

    got it - thanks!
22. 802.▲
    by logicallee 4y ago

    Yes, it is nice to see the python 3 migration is pretty much done, it really could have happened literally a decade ago! While we're all here: which is the package manager to use?
23. 803.▲
    by logicallee 4y ago

    Perhaps the $20,000 he spent on film equipment helped propel him to 2.9 million subscribers, 705 million video views, and $664,000 total earnings by allowing him to produce a grade of video that is better than other lego videos on YouTube.
24. 804.▲
    by logicallee 4y ago

    Location: New York City / US / EU Remote Remote: Yes. Willing to relocate: Yes but we should start remote. Technologies: Python (incl. numpy, pandas, scikit-learn) JavaScript, HTML5, SQL, Git, Flutter, Linux, AWS, SQL,
25. 805.▲
    by logicallee 4y ago

    SEEKING WORK | New York City, US / EU / Remote Technologies: Python, Web Applications, Mobile Applications, Data Analysis, Machine Learning, Product Management I'm passionate about machine learning/AI and its latest poss
26. 806.▲
    by logicallee 4y ago

    (I didn't mean a function that measures time passing, I just meant the time that a computation takes.) Regarding my question which you answered, this means there is no such thing as a pure function then, since any function has the &quo
27. 807.▲
    by logicallee 4y ago

    I'm curious about something. Is the time a functional program takes to run considered a side effect? You might think that in metaprogramming to generate a program you just care about the program you receive - it is a pure function, ri
28. 808.▲
    by logicallee 4y ago

    I see. I've emailed you a followup question in case you're interested. EDIT: Thanks for the answer!
29. 809.▲
    by logicallee 4y ago

    It sounds like you are very familiar with Ballard's work. Based on your reading, how does this Report on an Unidentified Space Station compare in style and theme to his other works?
30. 810.▲
    by logicallee 4y ago

    Based on your reading, how do Ballard's other works compare in style and theme to this Report on an Unidentified Space Station? Are the text style and the themes very similar?