Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
loceng
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
82 ms
·
631.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
Should we ignore that all of this is funded by the advertising industrial complex, advertisements which are arguably extremely harmful to society due to the cheap-shallow manipulation that occurs with them?
632.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
Properly designed studies for food need to be done in every single population to determine what genetic lineage differences there may be.
633.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
You do understand that's because it's not meant to - and it's not actually a valid comparison? That's the point: the animals do the work of the processing and concentrating protein, fat, and nutrients/amino acids in
634.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
Are they actually smart if they're bypassing the purpose of the challenges that are inherent to writing original work, that leads to them developing their mind?
635.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
So you're 100% for adding 3% of seaweed to cow's diets for an 80%+ reduction, or assuming that ~5% of reductions from livestock (from the chart on the URL you shared) are mostly from cows, bringing that 5% of total global emission
636.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
Thanks! After scrolling a bit it shows that "Energy" accounts for 73%+ of greenhouse gas emissions. Seems like 100% of effort should be going to energy production for the highest yield, most efficient outcome - and while not incre
637.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
It's also now known that adding a 3% concentration of a specific algae/seaweed to a cow's diet reduces their emissions by something like 80%+: "New Long-Term Study Could Mean More Sustainable Burgers" - https:/
638.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
Does anyone readily have access to the graph of emissions by each industry so this is seen in context?
639.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
Tip of the day: Replace "Reddit" with "Reveddit" of any Reddit.com URL to get access to an archive of deleted comments/accounts [assuming archived in time before deletion]
640.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
Just wait until you hear about Bret Weinstein's discovery about lab mice telomeres: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLb5hZLw44s
641.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
What are the odds the founders/developers of Telegram are being coerced towards this based on a possibility of evidence of illegal activities they may have done/do actively in their life? The odds certainly aren't zero?
642.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
I've wondered: what are the chances that big pharma will attempt to suppress these medicines that compete with their patentable products, like seems to be the case with the majority of drugs caught up in "the war on drugs"?
643.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
The acceleration is another big win.
644.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
Would it shock you to learn that mass shootings aren't the results of guns, but actually the result of mind-altering medications by pharmaceutical industry that are legal - but 1) in the clinical trials showed an actual increase in sui
645.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
I predict you're correct.
646.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
You got me wondering: how will Boring Company's Loop and Hyperloop faire in this same regard? Hyperloop being near vacuum to remove/reduce friction from the area, while vehicle likely on floating MagLev skate, accelerating up to 1
647.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
Can this, how does this, get captured by industry leading it to become relatively stagnant with high prices?
648.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
[flagged]
649.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
Here's a comedic piece by Awaken with JP, where he points out many historical events where within ~2-10 years of a government taking the guns away from the population then genocide occurred: "Why Guns Must Be Banned Now!" -
650.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
I've wondered is Rivian a legitimate play against Tesla et al, are the decisions being made in the correct path, or will that be unknown until 5-10+ years after billions more keep getting dumped into it that may hide any incompetence o
651.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
At its foundation it sounds like rent seeking.
652.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
If you can't with 100% certainty determine the number of real users you have you shouldn't be putting out any number, and second to that, you have to be open to challenges that "your"/their analysis isn't reaso
653.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
"Bot estimation for Twitter has no such analog." And that's acceptable there isn't well-established/widely accepted practices? Certainly Twitter and SEC will argue that to protect themselves from scrutiny and legal
654.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
So if you have a home inspector inspect a house before you buy it, and they say "yeah, it looks good" - but it turns out they didn't actually investigate in a way that arguably involves an adequate amount of integrity or in a
655.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
... "but that it was doing so specifically so that Musk would buy Twitter at an inflated price." The insanity is people being perfectionistic in that it was specific intent to target him to buy it - even if it says "him"
656.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
I imagine the argument is whether the method Twitter used, and was seemingly acceptable by SEC, is ethically, morally, or logically a reasonable measure. E.g. Can they 100% say that there are less than 5% bot accounts, or is that 5% number
657.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
If you haven't yet it's a good idea to do a microbiome stool test kit to see if there is any overgrowth of bad bacteria or yeast in your GI tract, as well an Igg food sensitivity test/food panel for 200+ foods to see if there
658.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
The amount of censorship and suppression of valid dialogue on HN is shameful.
659.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
I am curious too what % of those who contract the virus, seemingly easier than it used to be caught, have been vaccinated with the mRNA shots (how many shots, and how recently their last shots were).
660.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
"People who care about free speech don't respond to criticism with left-field accusations - that's a diversionary tactic. People who make serious buyout offers aren't trying to insert weed jokes in there." You didn&
More ›