loceng

44 ms·

541.
by loceng 4y ago
I am not trying to create a conspiracy theory here, but how difficult would it be to 1) sabotage an EV like Tesla to behave this way, and 2) for that sabotage to not be detected via monitoring how the vehicle does, and 3) could it or would
542.
by loceng 4y ago
How can we know who sent it though? You can't state the truth as one way or another, at least not yet.
543.
by loceng 4y ago
Sorry, I looked through a lot of articles and I don't recall which one it was; they're reported to be both in the Bahamas and Hong Kong, the Bahamas authorities also having said a claim that SBF made about them directing him to do
544.
by loceng 4y ago
And quite interesting that most of the FTX team/founders are reported to now be in Hong Kong - arguably knowing they have the protection of China?
545.
by loceng 4y ago
Is there truth to the U.S. sending money to Ukraine -> Ukraine funding FTX -> FTX being 2nd largest donor to Democratic party in the U.S.? Timeline: - April 25, 2019: Biden announces his presidential campaign. - 13 days later, Sam Ban
546.
by loceng 4y ago
Is this your field or you just became a bit of an expert through frustration?
547.
by loceng 4y ago
Fake nice is ugly. P.S. I'm not cynical, perhaps you meant to say skeptical; if it truly was only $40 billion per year then every country in the world would quickly pay their share to fund that.
548.
by loceng 4y ago
So we just have to stop the military industrial complex and problem solved! Likewise, it's a good thing Elon is attempting to disrupt the attack on free speech.
549.
by loceng 4y ago
"(reminder that he could have solved world hunger for a fraction of the price he paid for Twitter)" You added that as a joke, right? You don't actually believe that?
550.
by loceng 4y ago
If enough people pay, I imagine then yes. That would be highly beneficial, valuable to society.
551.
by loceng 4y ago
People willing to support an ad-free platform for communication?
552.
by loceng 4y ago
It's the fastest way to purposefully destroy whatever culture has formed (arguably poorly if the company is in its present state), and then can quickly rehire based on new, arguably better, direction; risky bet IMHO to bet against Elon
553.
by loceng 4y ago
I'm not sure how essentially being a referee to make the playing field fair fits under "influence and control politics" description.
554.
by loceng 4y ago
I suppose so long as whomever is control of the space superiority, and it's used only as a suppression system - similar to the Iron Dome providing a fairly effective wall to protest Israel, then it doesn't matter if someone gets a
555.
by loceng 4y ago
Isn't the issue here that you're putting such a weight or strong conviction on Elon as any promises he makes are gospel, the problem is you're putting him on a pedestal and under unreasonable expectations? And I'm famili
556.
by loceng 4y ago
It could do without the downvotes so lazy people don't get a dopamine hit reward by simply clicking a down arrow to suppress conversation, without adding anything to it - nor proving they deserve that power to downvote a specific comme
557.
by loceng 4y ago
Not for the ideological mob lacking emotional regulation and self-control. Edit to add: I see I triggered some of that mob.
558.
by loceng 4y ago
For "free"...
559.
by loceng 4y ago
Followed by a "How Old Do You Feel?" poll?
560.
by loceng 4y ago
Have you received any legal pressure to shutdown?
561.
by loceng 4y ago
Doing keyword analysis (and perhaps sentiment analysis) could be a really powerful/valuable way to see what subreddits have what ideological biases, most especially political-heavy subreddits; in particular ON KEYWORDS/topics in D
562.
by loceng 4y ago
I think this has been a great tool to use since I was introduced. Thanks.
563.
by loceng 4y ago
So the #2 problem is that you're not getting paid. And the #1 problem is actually much worse since "you" aren't paid - in that there is a strong likelihood that "you": 1) are a paid shill to suppress specific c
564.
by loceng 4y ago
There's no source or confirmation that 1,300 units were actually down, and, if they were down - it looks like because the service wasn't being paid for? Do you expect companies to provide services for free? The hypocrisy that Elon
565.
by loceng 4y ago
It was sold to Automattic by Verizon for only $3 million.. Deal of the century.
566.
by loceng 4y ago
Isn't this ethos similar to being counter to monopolistic patents? Could this trend lead to the abolishment of patents - and perhaps should an effort be made to help people understand the comparison?
567.
by loceng 4y ago
"... certain influential figures explicitly manipulate their speech in order to primarily amass personal power regardless of any second-order effects" And this would include those currently in power, no? Who want to further their
568.
by loceng 4y ago
"No one is as qualified to fight for speech on Twitter as the person who's done it through the company's most tumultuous decade." That's putting forward a ton of assumptions, none of which you cited supporting evide
569.
by loceng 4y ago
Perhaps that seemingly at least half of the articles are hit pieces, and that lack of integrity is worth discussion.
570.
by loceng 4y ago
You're forgetting he has access to teams of competent lawyers (and their networks) who will already have to interact with international law for Tesla et al.

More ›