Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
loceng
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
44 ms
·
571.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
Reminds me of when I my dad had acquired two decommissioned hard drives that were used to store seafloor scans for the Halifax harbour and surrounding areas. From my own poor recollection, their dimensions were about 2' x 3' x 1.5
572.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
Well, certainly someone got your money.
573.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
Even worse if it was your neighbours'.
574.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
It's all quite nuanced, and details are important, things like there will also be noise-vibrational pollution created from wind vs. solar.
575.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
Hmm.. wow, I sure fucked that up. Thanks for pointing out. I practically never do math in my head anymore - I either need to practice again to sharpen up a bit or only ever depend on calculators from now on. And true, 800k is plenty - you j
576.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
If 8 billion people in the world, your 99.99% leads to 80 million people who would be willing to harm others - a lot of people - where certainly only a fraction of that is enough to create an army for a tyrant; and to which where the second
577.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
It's likely best to contact them to ask questions for whatever you're wondering about. Their previous website was far better IMHO, as they listed on their pages the actual clinical data/results from their own research - where
578.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
Well, I fully agree with your first two sentences. Then genetics likely are the next in line for what is healthy, not harmful, for your body.
579.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
Some people cheer for the opposite: that a carnivore diet (or animal product only, but dairy/milk/cheese is bad and highly inflammatory for many) is what essentially cured them of mainly ailments. So, just to put that balanced per
580.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
> There is zero cognitive dissonance for me. I freely admit to everything you stipulated above in paragraph 1. But none of those statements logically flows to your conclusion, despite how strongly you seem to think they do. Such statemen
581.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
Look into the company Emcell at emcell.com. They're in Ukraine. Controversial, however they claim that fetal stem cell treatments (used from donated tissue, if that makes a difference to you) - if degeneration of healing systems of the
582.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
Elon on Twitter was saying it can be made much more accurate than GPS, just that it's not a priority for them.
583.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
"* entirely too large fountain sodas" The slipping hazard from a potential spill is just too high.
584.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
Cool. Yup, I think it's good to have that text. Another common tactic is creating an actual Demo page, as if a user was logged-in, where they can say play around with sample clips already uploaded - especially if there's functiona
585.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
I can't remember the name but there's a Reddit subreddit where people can post photos to request colorization, so that may be an option if you're curious what some passionate volunteers might do for you.
586.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
Looks like a good start - and lots of polish, refinement still possible. Have you been regularly getting feedback from new people you've introduced to it to make little adjustments to the text/copy, and other elements? P.S. I thin
587.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
You admit to there being coordinated efforts against labor and the working class - so how do you deal with the cognitive dissonance with 1) the history that the pharmaceutical industry continuously being a very bad actor with the reward of
588.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
The tweet: "Search ranking and censorship are entirely different things. We make our results useful by ranking spam lower. We are not ranking based on any political agenda or my (or anyone else's) personal political opinions. We a
589.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
"P.S. For those who believe that putting "fact-checkers" in quotes is denying truth, promoting misinformation, etc, etc -- I put it in quotes because even giving them that title gives them more power than they should have.&qu
590.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
But how isn't this disingenuous? The reason you'd de-rank is because less users then get exposed to whatever narratives/information you want hidden, the reason why you de-rank. Users use a search engine for passive exposure t
591.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
Do you know if DDG also did the same - or perhaps their rankings were already captured by the likes of Reuters et al ("fact checkers") - for the COVID pandemic narrative? It's quite apparent their desired narrative is falling
592.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
Whales are loud with their communication, so I could see that easily being possible - especially as pods and even specific whales apparently have unique voices.
593.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
I was hoping this was somehow mapped in real-time to follow movements of ocean life. Is there any efforts to doing so, if it's even a reasonable endeavour? I personally think it'd be a worthwhile thing to do - but maybe will take
594.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
I could see something reasonable being a surcharge for allowing access to an "archaic" system - however then that fee should be subsidized to the business, by the centralized organizations, as such "archaic" systems are
595.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
Similarly with buying up real estate in various countries, notably Canada, where they can maintain an upward pressure on prices relatively easily - while acquiring actual land and buildings of at least some value - in order to cause undue a
596.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
Why aren't there laws requiring to stop this problem from being a problem?
597.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
How did he cause his fans to harass families? Did he specifically brigade families or tell people to go after them?
598.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
Indeed, it's difficult to easily imagine a platform that requires enough complexity to facilitate a relatively free market ecosystem where third-parties voluntarily integrate in reciprocal relationship; it's not straight-forward,
599.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
What I'd love to know is how much they put in, when their buys were, so we can see how much "profit" they would of otherwise had if they had sold. It'd be interesting to see what their role, if any, in promoting all of t
600.
▲
by
loceng
4y ago
Just because he's only shared a short tweet about something, you're automatically assuming he's only half-ass thought about it?
More ›