lnenad

5 ms·

31.
by lnenad 2mo ago
Deepseek is the enemy, the implication is being on hn you should know that and not work for them. /s
32.
by lnenad 2mo ago
They've probably got companies lined up to give them jobs that will pay multiples of those. The runner up is even more interesting, with a slightly larger reason to feel like they should have won it. They did ~3nm (out of 4 iirc) of 4.
33.
by lnenad 2mo ago
It's a great mindset to have, *if* you're able to control your emotions.
34.
by lnenad 2mo ago
It's also a warzone visualization tool unintentionally.
35.
by lnenad 2mo ago
Yeah not sure why this is on the front-page
36.
by lnenad 2mo ago
Again the analogy isn't complete. If I went in knowing the teacher isn't an expert in the field and they might get some things wrong I'd definitely double check stuff. I'm sure you've had similar teachers in your li
37.
by lnenad 2mo ago
> Part of the entire premise of the article is that many people aren’t being given a choice Yeah, "part", but that's not the part I wrote about?
38.
by lnenad 2mo ago
We're not talking about "the public". The person writing the article is a very experienced software engineer. There shouldn't be a gap in understanding.
39.
by lnenad 2mo ago
You are right, it's not 500x8 it's 90x8.
40.
by lnenad 2mo ago
I don't really see your point. You're still using the screwdriver and it's up to you to use it when it makes sense, see if it's doing it's job properly, fix issues it creates etc... If it's not doing a good job
41.
by lnenad 2mo ago
> It's more like a hammer that never drives nails straight unless you hold it in a specific uncomfortable manner. I mean sure, pick any analogy, still doesn't change the fact that there are right uses and wrong uses; right ways
42.
by lnenad 2mo ago
But English is literally the interface. It's the *same* as `--make-no-mistakes`, it's just your preference compared to directly telling it to the AI which is ok. That doesn't change the fact the using the tool correctly != us
43.
by lnenad 2mo ago
> An Honest Review > I do admit that this approach immediately triggered my contrarian side and made me very defiant of any AI tool. Makes sense. > While this could be partially remedied by always asking for a primary source or cit
44.
by lnenad 2mo ago
830t/s is burst aggregate. ~500 is sustained and it's for 8 concurrent users. Meaning for $1.99/hour if you serve 8 users it's 8*$0.54, not just $0.54. You shouldn't rent one out if you're just serving it for y
45.
by lnenad 3mo ago
Not just that, even if we had the power to do so, we don't know anywhere near 100% of our bodies.
46.
by lnenad 3mo ago
I actually made something that has that exact purpose, making reviewing easier. https://github.com/lnenad/difiko
47.
by lnenad 3mo ago
I actually made the same thing in Rust https://github.com/lnenad/difiko Just FYI a large portion is vibecoded for those that don't like that.
48.
by lnenad 3mo ago
Cool demo, but even the smallest model does 2.5 tps on my 7900xtx which is not great.
49.
by lnenad 3mo ago
Another happy user here. Thank you for the awesome project.
50.
by lnenad 3mo ago
I don't hate AI companies. The key value proposition is gather data > feed it to AI for semantic analysis (does the actual work, is a prompt) > display it in a UI
51.
by lnenad 3mo ago
It's still a prompt, it's just not a static one. Either way props for building a company from it.
52.
by lnenad 3mo ago
I thought startups wrapping prompts would require something a more complex than semantic analysis, which is literally what this is. And for 500 bucks. Wow. Props for being able to sell this. I don't get the appeal of the UI, why is it
53.
by lnenad 3mo ago
But 10% is 50 million square kilometers. If we project this surface area to a theoretical planet with a diameter of 2000kms this planet alone would support 2000+ Starlink satellites in LEO. This is again not negligible.
54.
by lnenad 3mo ago
Yeah, nothing exists in a vacuum :), even for concrete columns rebar is added.
55.
by lnenad 3mo ago
That's true, but it's still factor and if price comes down having that much compressive strength at your disposal could be an interesting choice for supertall skyscrapers.
56.
by lnenad 3mo ago
Yes, I agree! But a 10% increase in surface area of LEO isn't small when compared to the size of the satellite, taking into account how the surface area at 10km compares to airplanes.
57.
by lnenad 3mo ago
Respectfully disagree as you're comparing the surface to the size of the object, so it definitely matters. Here's some math: Average Earth diameter: 12742kms + 10km Average airplane surface area = 500m2 12752^2*pi = 510,865,389km
58.
by lnenad 3mo ago
> High compressive strengths are not very useful. I mean, it depends on the use case right? Modern tall buildings/skyscrapers with metal framing use metal pillars where high compressive strength is very useful.
59.
by lnenad 3mo ago
Surface of a sphere (spheroid) is the square of the diameter. Planes fly at ~10kms, satellites at orders of magnitude higher.
60.
by lnenad 3mo ago
I'm building a low friction logging/metrics platform that allows for easy visibility into your apps. The idea was to make something that isn't really geared towards enterprise and can be used by anyone. I started about 6 mont

More ›