lnenad

6 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by lnenad 3mo ago

   Considering the DeepSWE result (imho if you're gonna give value to benchmarks this is one of the best) it's not good enough.
2. 62.▲
   by lnenad 3mo ago

   I get it, you just prefer to do things differently > Faster iteration means i mentally checkout less and am more involved with the code being created. This is a good point I didn't consider and you're right. More interaction br
3. 63.▲
   by lnenad 3mo ago

   You can ask for a complete feature/app/business. Or you can split up the work into verifiable/testable pieces and rely on a high quality AI to deliver. As time goes by the pieces will get larger as capability grows. I still t
4. 64.▲
   by lnenad 3mo ago

   Again, my point is exactly the opposite. Higher quality implies a mistake isn't made in a significant % of cases.
5. 65.▲
   by lnenad 3mo ago

   Why? I'm personally on the opposite end. Less babysitting/higher quality means more time goes back to me/the user. 1000tps of bad code means you have to keep validating the output and circling back.
6. 66.▲
   by lnenad 3mo ago

   For me it's the skill. So many things you have to be good at to build this. Really impressive and slightly jealous.
7. 67.▲
   by lnenad 3mo ago

   Very nice! Thank you for building this.
8. 68.▲
   by lnenad 3mo ago

   What wild regurgitation of some generic sentence is this lol?
9. 69.▲
   by lnenad 3mo ago

   If it's my data/money getting stolen, I'd give no fucks about MSI getting a fine or whatever the usual reaction to these fuckups is. On the other hand, if I found an exploit and there wasn't a bounty available, I'd
10. 70.▲
    by lnenad 3mo ago

    But it's not "MSI computers" it's actual people getting pwned.
11. 71.▲
    by lnenad 3mo ago

    Ok? I agree with everything. What does that have to do with reporting exploits that don't have bounties?
12. 72.▲
    by lnenad 3mo ago

    You're actually helping the people that use the software from getting pwned, companies are secondary beneficiaries.
13. 73.▲
    by lnenad 3mo ago

    You understand the concept of doing something that doesn't bring direct monetary benefit?
14. 74.▲
    by lnenad 3mo ago

    Did I ever say any of those things?
15. 75.▲
    by lnenad 3mo ago

    I'm not justifying anything nor am I arguing against it. I'm saying it's not a thing worth mentioning as it's not related to AI in any way. If one would try to find AI related negatives go for datacentres, chip shortage&
16. 76.▲
    by lnenad 3mo ago

    Literally every CEO AI or otherwise claims bullshit about their product. It's their job. It's got nothing to do with people actually using something and not coming to terms with it having any value. If you've never seen a scr
17. 77.▲
    by lnenad 3mo ago

    Yup, it's wild watching this happen live.
18. 78.▲
    by lnenad 4mo ago

    Same as others have said. Unless you're targeting single digit amount of people start-ups this is a bad idea.
19. 79.▲
    by lnenad 4mo ago

    My point is you'd be doing the same if you wrote the code or an average person did it. If you spend time for the prep work AI is solid in execution.
20. 80.▲
    by lnenad 4mo ago

    I never understood people like you. Factually that's just not true. Five years ago current llms would have seen like magic to even data scientists working on them and realistically their impact has been felt by many. Just taking jobs i
21. 81.▲
    by lnenad 4mo ago

    Wow, truly amazing that you can print a high fidelity Snickers bar.
22. 82.▲
    by lnenad 4mo ago

    I was really hoping we’d have more time before enshittification arrived. But apparently, an old Xeon running Qwen is my destiny.
23. 83.▲
    by lnenad 4mo ago

    On a gut level I agree 100% as I'm feeling the same feelings and prefer no contact. But on a biological level it's definitely better to have more social interactions and talking to strangers specifically has many benefits to both
24. 84.▲
    by lnenad 4mo ago

    Of course. Primarily the styling and a lack of symbols tldraw/excalidraw, and for draw.io I dislike the UI/look and feel.
25. 85.▲
    by lnenad 4mo ago

    I didn't like how diagram making apps were built so I developed https://grafly.io I also vibecoded/built https://github.com/lnenad/difiko as AI generates a lot of code that needs a nice way to rev
26. 86.▲
    by lnenad 4mo ago

    The world isn't US based rates. There are plenty of people that would be taking these "non-economical" projects and being extremely happy with the money they can make from them.
27. 87.▲
    by lnenad 4mo ago

    I'm talking about actual live services that deliver money to someone, not toy projects. Do you think there's even a slight percentage of those or are 100% of the projects hosted by these services throwaway shit?
28. 88.▲
    by lnenad 4mo ago

    Please try to read my message again. I never said the things you're implying I said. I literally said not gonna replace all, and low effort low risk stuff. Do you think that not even 0.00001 projects on those websites could have been a
29. 89.▲
    by lnenad 4mo ago

    It literally has and will even more in the future. It won't replace *all* software engineers but once the genie is out low effort low risk stuff will be done by an AI. Loveable and such have so many live projects, the alternative was a
30. 90.▲
    by lnenad 4mo ago

    It's not a valid point imho as your paying for tokens, not hours, per token value is much more important and the purpose of getting more lower value tokens does not exist (unless for a fraction of the price to get to the same result).