llmslave2

43 ms·

91.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
3 seems likely, especially since defending their views in this particular case opens them up to some pretty nasty insults. Also I think a lot of people simply think models which are published openly shouldn't be held to the same legal
92.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
An intern is a human, unlike Microsoft Word or an LLM, which are tools/machines/etc.
93.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
I find it fascinating to read comments from a lot of people who support open models without guardrails, and then to read this thread with seemingly the opposite sentiment in overwhelming majority. Is it just two different sets of users with
94.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
Right, but the makers of the murder weapon aren't culpable. Or do you think a Microsoft exec should go to jail every time someone uses it to write a death threat?
95.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
You can use esbuild to build your entire project with a single command. Node has a built in test runner. You only need the complexity because you're convinced you need it.
96.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
And also a build pipeline doesn't have to be difficult to write. You can do it in like 50 lines of code and esbuild. And then you get to bundle your CSS, use React or whatever, Typescript, etc.
97.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
> I believe this new wave of zeal is being somewhat driven by an Anthropic astroturfing campaign. Yeah I've sort of noticed this on X for the brief time I was on there this weekend. The Claude Code creator was hyping it up to the mo
98.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
Thank you for your insightful comment! I appreciate your enthusiasm for this innovative approach. You've highlighted several key strengths of this design: - Pragmatic syntax choice: The comment-based annotation system is indeed a cleve
99.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
I'm sure there is plenty of language parsers written in Haskell in the training data. Regardless, the question isn't if LLMs can generate code (they clearly can), it's if agentic workflows are superior to writing code by hand
100.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
There is evidence that LLM usage is actually making people dumber. I'm not sure if they've figured out the cause/effect or not but that's enough evidence for me to avoid them if I can. They can be useful for some stuff b
101.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
This is a complete fantasy. If LLM's got to this point of sophistication there would be a total revolution in almost every industry. Society would be radically different. Since LLM's are nowhere near this, I'm not so sure we
102.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
Government adjacent feels directly relevant considering the government is a de facto monopoly.
103.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
Ok but you didn't ask any questions in the transcript you provided. Maybe that one was an outlier? In order to learn you generally need to actually do the thing, and usually multiple times. My point is that it's easy to use an AI
104.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
It's all talk and no evidence.
105.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
Mmm, I do a lot of frontend work but I find writing the frontend code myself is faster. That seems to be mostly what everyone says it's good for. I find it useful for other stuff like writing mini scripts, figuring out arguments for co
106.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
Can't believe this car bubble has lasted so long. It's gonna pop any decade now!
107.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
With all due respect you were reading, not learning. It's like when people watch educational YouTube videos as entertainment, it feels like they're learning but they aren't. It's fine to use the LLMs in the same way that
108.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
Perhaps it is a skill issue. But I don't really see the point of trying when it seems like the gains are marginal. If agent workflows really do start offering 2x+ level improvements then perhaps I'll switch over, in the meantime I
109.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
Yeah if only Google shipped more crap software that they then go onto cancel, their software would be so much better!!!!!
110.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
Calling it now: AI withdrawal will become a documented disorder.
111.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
What's the link?
112.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
I would never suggest that only I know better. Plenty of other people are observing the same thing, and there is also research backing it up. Maybe shocked is the wrong term. Surprised, perhaps.
113.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
That sounds reasonable to me. AI is best at generating super basic and common code, it will have plenty of training on game templates and simple games. Obviously you cannot generalize that to all software development though.
114.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
> Numbers don't matter Yes that's already been well established.
115.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
No but I don't use it to generate code usually. I gave agents a solid go and I didn't feel more productive, just became more stupid.
116.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
Even 2.5x is absurd. If they said 1.5x I might believe them.
117.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
Yes and yes.
118.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
Surely searching "centre a div" takes less time than prompting and waiting for a response...
119.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
> Even with refinement and back-and-forth prompting, I’m easily 10x more productive Developers notoriously overestimate the productivity gains of AI, especially because it's akin to gambling every time you make a prompt, hoping for
120.
by llmslave2 9mo ago
How are you using AI to learn? I see a lot of people say this but simply reading AI generated overviews or asking it questions isn't really learning.

More ›