llm_trw

52 ms·

931.
by llm_trw 2y ago
OpenAI was smart enough to build a moat for itself in Europe. The EU was dumb enough to dig it for them.
932.
by llm_trw 2y ago
>but tests are still the only way to verify the implementation of nontrivial code But who tests your tests?
933.
by llm_trw 2y ago
>The market never seems to end producing those developers who spend their life refactoring and never shipping anything, nor taking responsibility for the fact that their pile of technologies SLOWS DOWN the other developers while never so
934.
by llm_trw 2y ago
I have no idea how old you are, but being in my 40s and needing to get results quickly I don't really care to learn the minutia for whatever type of stamp collecting is important for the project I'm working on now.
935.
by llm_trw 2y ago
No idea, I mostly use freecad and I've been told autocad has more tools. In freecard there are parametric tools which are very much like what was shown in the demo but in 3d. I tend to use script which render to openscad for the parts
936.
by llm_trw 2y ago
The social web died, all you're doing it making pitchfork and torch 2.0 for mobs. If you want to add value and not bloody public spectacle rank comments instead of users. I have a bunch of low quality posts here when idiots piss me off
937.
by llm_trw 2y ago
You hit them after dozens of uses on the big models and hundreds on the small ones.
938.
by llm_trw 2y ago
LLMs aren't tech that can be free, the good ones are expensive enough that we have to move away from the malvertising economy that was supported by keyword searches. Here's hoping capitalism starts working again with subscriptions
939.
by llm_trw 2y ago
My beef with perplexity is that there is no way to increase the number of uses of large models. People keep telling me that I can use the smaller models, but I really can't. I'm using this for work and those things are toys which
940.
by llm_trw 2y ago
>Tractors are slower than cars, why would you use them?
941.
by llm_trw 2y ago
I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. That specialist interfaces make you productive? Sketchpad was just a cad tool, one of the first ones to be sure, but still a design tool. We have substantially better ones today: https
942.
by llm_trw 2y ago
>- Is it reasonable to grant such privilege access to a piece of software that ultimately is a black box ? As I said in the previous thread: explaining to execs that giving root to someone on your machines means they have root is a very
943.
by llm_trw 2y ago
Wait so you're telling me I can run podman on android?
944.
by llm_trw 2y ago
When you get x on turmux working you see what mobile development could have been and weep for the fallen world we live in.
945.
by llm_trw 2y ago
>I suspect if you start creating a feedback loop with these models they will tend to become very unstable very fast. We already see with these more linear LLMs that they can be extremely sensitive to the values of parameters like the tem
946.
by llm_trw 2y ago
Inconsistent implies there is some type of error in the rendering. This was done on purpose.
947.
by llm_trw 2y ago
The unicode spec has always, and will always, have it as a pistol. Stop destroying standards because they hurt your feelings.
948.
by llm_trw 2y ago
Zizek said it best: every culture war is today's conservatives fighting the conservatives of 30 years in the future.
949.
by llm_trw 2y ago
https://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U1F300.pdf This is a case of companies rendering 1F52B to something it is specifically not.
950.
by llm_trw 2y ago
A bunch of busy bodies decided to change the meaning of a unicode character: https://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/1f52b/index.ht... This is a problem since unicode characters are meant to be unc
951.
by llm_trw 2y ago
>I really hope that people hate AI and fight against using it because it gives me an edge. This is my problem too. AI is amazing for my work, I finish a days worth of work in two hours. At the same time if everyone else started using it
952.
by llm_trw 2y ago
Just because you keep saying it doesn't make it true. LLMs are not software any more than photographs are.
953.
by llm_trw 2y ago
So does a video. Is a video open source if you're given the permissions to edit it? To distribute it? Given the files to generate it? What if the files can only be open in a proprietary program? Videos aren't software and neither
954.
by llm_trw 2y ago
>- The reason the mail looks funny is that it predates the Internet; some of what you see is Arpanet mail, and some (like the first one) is internal ITS mail. Looking at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc
955.
by llm_trw 2y ago
> where the source and methods that that generate the artifact, that is the weights, is open. When you require the same thing in software, namely the whole stack to run the software in question to be open source, we don't call the l
956.
by llm_trw 2y ago
It means nothing because LLMs aren't software.
957.
by llm_trw 2y ago
More like vegetarians show up claiming to be vegans, then vegans show up and explain why eating animal products is still wrong. That's the difference between open source and free software.
958.
by llm_trw 2y ago
>The open source movement, from which the name derives, was about the freedom to make bespoke alterations to the software you choose to run. The open source movement was a cash grab to make the free software movement more palatable to bi
959.
by llm_trw 2y ago
This is bending the definition to the other extreme. Linux doesn't ship you the compiler you need to build the binaries either, that doesn't mean it's closed source. LLMs are fundamentally different to software and using term
960.
by llm_trw 2y ago
I have better things to fight against than hair loss.

More ›