llm_nerd

5 ms·

61.
by llm_nerd 25d ago
That's, uh, a great contribution. Thanks. It's super important that HN learns how this sounds like to you.
62.
by llm_nerd 25d ago
> Nerfed Fable, as many of noted it's useless I certainly don't take AI advice from HN, but this is amazing . Useless? Yes, the safeguards are ridiculous and obnoxious, though I can say that 5.1 greatly relaxes them (just do
63.
by llm_nerd 26d ago
>hat's their problem not the Canadians Ignoring that your mad king did this specifically because he's an emotionally immature geriatric toddler and had a war of words with the Premier of Ontario, and that the renaming was 10
64.
by llm_nerd 27d ago
How would that number help at all or change the discussion? Is R&D not a real expense? I mean, this argument would have merit if they built something that they're going to monetize for decades, but cutting edge models now grow obso
65.
by llm_nerd 28d ago
If Eve were green-fielded today, there is a 0% chance they would choose Python anywhere in the service layer for an online game. Zero chance. Python is a fantastic "glue" programming language. A duct-tape language. It's a
66.
by llm_nerd 28d ago
Using python for a purpose like this is extremely strange -- it clearly is just technology debt they've been carrying around from a silly decision over a decade ago -- so someone mentioned a contemporary, more acceptable alternative.
67.
by llm_nerd 29d ago
A number of data centres have been proposed in Alberta, including a giant Meta one. Alberta has a derelict, obsolete power grid that can't even serve the current population, so you might wonder how that is possible. They're coupli
68.
by llm_nerd 1mo ago
ROFL. Christ. Alright, buddy. Hey, your child-diddler rapist just renamed something! Yay! WINNING!
69.
by llm_nerd 1mo ago
At this point I assume this is all an act. Like some sort of parody. Because there is simply no way. >No the world isn’t turning against the US, just people in the internet who like to think it is. https://www.pewresearch.org&
70.
by llm_nerd 1mo ago
> So what? You specifically chose a thing that Trump has tried to use as a lever multiple times. Again, I want 100% of vehicle production from the US barred from Canada. A 0 vehicle quota. Let the US automakers collapse into the eventual
71.
by llm_nerd 1mo ago
>So you wouldn't take issue with an America quota on assembled motor vehicles, for example, since that wouldn't be a tariff? Maybe that automaker moves most of its facilities back to the US and now yea you've got one facto
72.
by llm_nerd 1mo ago
> So how do tariffs come in to play if there are no tariffs applied? What is the duty you pay on duty free goods? Is this a serious question? Canada negotiated in a quota of dairy products the US could export to Canada tariff free. If
73.
by llm_nerd 1mo ago
> The US is not in a desperate need of any product from Canada. Nice to have and super important? Yea. Desperate? No. Not by any stretch of the imagination. The US oil stockpile is rapidly declining, it is desperately buying up bonds to
74.
by llm_nerd 1mo ago
> This seems illogical. It is. When Canada imposes retaliatory tariffs, it is of course a tax on Canadians. Though it is also a market inducement, and one of the complaints of the admin is that Canada's retaliatory vehicle tariffs -
75.
by llm_nerd 1mo ago
> Or they just disagree with you. Sure, there is about 33% of the public that are vile, hateful, racist garbage. That's life. Those people all love Musk. He's their pied piper, and we can only hope he leads them all to Mars or
76.
by llm_nerd 1mo ago
There are many already. The code is not why people use those sites. In the case of Meta specifically, it's basically in spite of the user-hostile, garbage code. The network effect / entrenchment means that any replacement has to b
77.
by llm_nerd 1mo ago
The PDF consortium added JXL to the PDF spec two years after Apple deployed support to billions of devices. To anyone ackchyually paying attention to the JXL spec, lamenting that this superior format wallowed in obscurity (largely, it s
78.
by llm_nerd 1mo ago
What a funny tangent to go off on. JXL was dead. Apple is who brought it back to life[1], and the only reason Chrome resurrected JXL, and now Firefox followed their path, is because Apple pushed JXL support to a billion plus devices. I know
79.
by llm_nerd 1mo ago
Someone made an HN without AI filter and it front paged here a bit ago. https://elijahpotter.dev/hnsansai (That's the first one I found, maybe there were others) So...are you complainers all using it? If not, why not?
80.
by llm_nerd 1mo ago
>I have found it pretty amazing that Apple basically didn't do much with AI software The iPhone 15 was almost entirely marketed based upon AI (I would say fraudulently so, advertising features they still haven't delivered), a
81.
by llm_nerd 1mo ago
Bizarre comment. I think the best is when you declare it "stupid" because China got its population explosion under control...at 1.4 BILLION PEOPLE . And the problem is that today everyone always waves away China bringing enormo
82.
by llm_nerd 1mo ago
This is the very definition of the Tragedy of the Commons. Without everyone committing to common limits, it is folly for anyone to. And FWIW, I don't buy the "but the countries that bred like rabbits for the past few decades are
83.
by llm_nerd 1mo ago
Let me help you understand. If there was a post on HN that said "I often see people wearing socks over their pants, and this is why you shouldn't wear your socks over your pants", someone might observe "is this a thing?
84.
by llm_nerd 1mo ago
>But a model on its own can’t do anything—it’s the agent/harness that escaped An agent/harness "can't do anything" on its own either, so how is saying "an agent escaped" somehow accurate? People talked
85.
by llm_nerd 1mo ago
>[1] instead of your own country (this becomes "we have to manufacture in China, we don't have the capability here!"), destroy your corporations through espionage [2,3], or through subsidy-enabled dumping prices and prefer
86.
by llm_nerd 1mo ago
I've literally never heard anyone conflate an agent and a model. Ever. Often with posts like this I imagine someone had their own confusion and then somehow projected it on everyone else. Like Trump thinking people didn't know abo
87.
by llm_nerd 1mo ago
>If Antrophic cannot provide reliable services on that price, customers will be unsatisfied. The complaint wasn't "I paid for X and now they say they aren't going to give me X", it was "I paid for X, and they sai
88.
by llm_nerd 1mo ago
Look up the burn rate for OpenAI and Anthropic. Despite the fact that these companies have managed to hook a lot of F500 companies into paying millions for token-level API pricing, they are bleeding cash at a catastrophic rate. And we know
89.
by llm_nerd 1mo ago
This discussion does not concern whether the user "cares". And clearly from my comment I don't "care". But it explains why a nascent, hyper-competitive (I mean, clearly not remotely a monopoly) market has such errat
90.
by llm_nerd 1mo ago
>You don't feel they want to give you a dependable service for an, albeit premium, price. It's a constant bargaining game We all know that the subscription prices are not at all sustainable for these providers. You all do, ri

More ›