ljosifov

21 ms·

91.
by ljosifov 1y ago
It will recombine the existing resources in new ways. Neanderthals had access to exactly the same natural resources as we have now. Obviously we do much more with what we both got, then they ever did. Obviously it's not only the availa
92.
by ljosifov 1y ago
I'm assuming the Intelligence Revolution, multiplying Human Intelligence with machines, will have the same effect as the Industrial Revolution had, on multiplying human physical strength. That multiplied the GDP by a factor of ~20 time
93.
by ljosifov 1y ago
You may be right about the damage (will not dispute it even if I personally doubt it) - but what about the amount of good that it can do too? When deciding "what is to be done now" under uncertainty, we typically look at both side
94.
by ljosifov 1y ago
:-) I like the symmetry of this. If I want to keep my creations outside the hands of others, I can keep them private. I don’t have to publish these words or broadcast them to the world. I could write this on my laptop, save it in a file, an
95.
Look Ma, No Bubbles: Designing a Low-Latency Megakernel for Llama-1B(hazyresearch.stanford.edu)
236 points by ljosifov 1y ago|31 comments
96.
by ljosifov 1y ago
Haha :-) - fine, hope no offence taken. :-) (none was intended) It came with the flow, flow was - US-... -Government, -Citizens, -Dollar, and then when it came to "people of the world that are not US citizens" (but are users of US
97.
by ljosifov 1y ago
On Hugging face I see 4B and 2B versions now - https://huggingface.co/collections/google/gemma-3n-preview-6... Gemma 3n Preview google/gemma-3n-E4B-it-litert-preview google/gemma-3n-E2B-it-litert-preview
98.
by ljosifov 1y ago
Because there are 1) willing exporters of US dollars USD (the US federal government USG ultimately, and US citizens in the final analysis); and 2) willing users of USD - us non-US-ian people around the world. When I sell stuff to someone in
99.
by ljosifov 1y ago
This more than anything feels emblematic to me, that Apple executives are brain dead when it comes to software. AI seemingly being a step too far. (in the s/w direction.) While they could at some level grok classical s/w, NN-s are
100.
by ljosifov 1y ago
I'm enjoying this ngl. :-) Alibaba_Qwen did themselves proud--top marks! Qwen3-30B-A3B, a MoE 30B - with only 3B active at any one time I presume? - 4bit MLX in lmstudio, with speculative decoding via Qwen3-0.6B 8bit MLX, on an oldish
101.
by ljosifov 1y ago
Amusingly enough, people writing stuff like the above, to my mind come over as doing what they are accusing LLMs of doing. :-) And in discussions "is it or isn't it, AI smarter than HI already", reminds me to "remember h
102.
GLM-4-32B-0414 series models(huggingface.co)
3 points by ljosifov 1y ago|0 comments
103.
by ljosifov 2y ago
I don't necessarily disagree on the need - but it's not my (re)definition. Having said that - I rather like the use. "Stupid" is part of quartet. All humans are categorised in four categories: intelligent (I), helpless (
104.
by ljosifov 2y ago
IDK whether you know it, but in case you don't—you articulated Cippola's definition "stupid is one causing harm to others while not deriving any gain, even taking a small personal loss" above. If you are interested furth
105.
AMD Ryzen AI Max Plus 395 Processor – Video Review Asus Flow Z13 Gaming Tablet(youtube.com)
1 points by ljosifov 2y ago|0 comments
106.
by ljosifov 2y ago
People like getting scared. That's how they pay billions of $$$ every year to watch mostly cr*ppy horror movies. GM has been a joke for years now. At some point his ramblings reached a GPT3.5 level, and have not improved since. It&#x27
107.
DeepSeek-R1 on Mac Studio 192GB(twitter.com)
3 points by ljosifov 2y ago|0 comments
108.
by ljosifov 2y ago
I didn't see this Sabine video mentioned in the comments. Maybe of interest to someone interested in entropy in physics. "I don't believe the 2nd law of thermodynamics. (The most uplifting video I'll ever make.)" h
109.
by ljosifov 2y ago
Indeed - correct!
110.
by ljosifov 2y ago
Heh - this! ZX-Spectrum with 16K RAM cost £100. With 48K RAM it cost £130. The keyboard was bad. Basic commands were assigned to combinations of keys, not typed letter by letter. The cpu was Z80A at almost 4MHz! Most popular, as it was very
111.
by ljosifov 2y ago
+1 Seconding this. My limited experience with pandas had a non-trivial number of moments "?? Is it really like this? Nah - I'm mistaken for sure, this can not be, no one would do something insane like that". And yet and yet..
112.
by ljosifov 2y ago
+1. I also use Samsung Galaxy Watch (Active2) and find it to work well for me. I'm surprised more people don't know about it. I know couple of people that suffer from high BP. They showed little interest when I told them about the
113.
by ljosifov 2y ago
Not the OP, but I remember reading about many twists and turns on the road to various inventions described in Matt Ridley's "How Innovation Works". I personally like "Happy Accidents. Serendipity in Major Medical Breakth
114.
by ljosifov 2y ago
You have agency. Yes - the system provides incentives. However, you are not some pass-through nothingness to just accept any incentives. You can chose to not accept the incentives. You can leave the system. You're lucky - it's not
115.
by ljosifov 2y ago
The list of things the consider is long almost exhaustive. Most of the points have already been made, some by other people too, if you follow these things online. While there is nothing there earth-shattering, it's good to see it all n
116.
by ljosifov 2y ago
The literal truth can hardly be a "propaganda line". More constructive criticisms are 1) private sector could have done better with the same finance (ultimately - resources); and 2) interest on that is paying basic income to peopl
117.
by ljosifov 2y ago
You are entirely right. If the same number was called "private credit" I believe no one would bat an eyelid about it. Of all the non-issues to spend time on - this is the least worth anyone's time.
118.
by ljosifov 2y ago
You are right and IDK why you are downvoted. Few units of perceptrons, few nodes in a decision tree, few of anything - they are "interpretable". Billions of the sames - are not interpretable any more. This b/c our understandi
119.
Winning the DARPA Grand Challenge by Sebastian Thrun [video](youtube.com)
1 points by ljosifov 2y ago|1 comments
120.
by ljosifov 2y ago
Google TechTalks August 2, 2006 ABSTRACT The DARPA grand challenge, technical details enabling Sebastian Thrun's win, and an introduction to the next phase called "The Urban Grand Challenge".

More ›