listennexttime

4 ms·

1.
by listennexttime 6y ago
It's okay, neither does the blog author. Despite their only value-add being a PM-role, they aren't doing a good job of that either. As evidenced by the fact that they've basically just resorted to doing tons of retrofit to br
2.
by listennexttime 6y ago
Another argument that largely hinges on calling me a name; amusing considering I'm normally considered the annoying-bleeding-heart-softie. And you know, the part where I said parents deserve a break in my reply that you ignored. Parent
3.
by listennexttime 6y ago
Nice of you and others to ignore: >I absolutely think parents should get a break during the pandemic. I think everyone should. I am alone. I am completely alone. Completely socially isolated. And being expected to work 50 hours a week, a
4.
by listennexttime 6y ago
I'm a low empathy technocrat because: (1) I chose not to have children, and (2) I find it unfair that I'm expected to work longer hours for the same compensation/work profile. Is that it? ... No, that's not it. Your posi
5.
by listennexttime 6y ago
How tedious to have to constantly refute FUD when it's easy to find the answers with Google. Anyone involved in Kubernetes, near CoreOS at the time, or really anywhere in the space at the time (instead of looking back at it with anger)
6.
by listennexttime 6y ago
I don't know the author, or Denis, but Denis in the comments is right. This is exactly the kind of pseudo-intellectual, inflammatory contrarian opinion that I'm unsurprised to see upvoted. This article completely conflates contain
7.
by listennexttime 7y ago
So what changed in the last few days? What is playing out is EXACTLY what epidimiologists, scientists, mathemeticians, the US intelligence agencies, and the WHO have been saying for over a month at this point. This has ALL been predicted an