lispre

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by lispre 7y ago

   Thanks for your comments, I will stick to optimizing my ugly code for the people who love small and tiny things
2. 2.▲
   by lispre 7y ago

   The first reflection of many people on this post is that we already have tools like grep, ag, pt, ripgrep and so on, why you create a more junk thing. my answer is as followed: 1. I just need a simpler and more direct thing, just like &q
3. 3.▲
   A small tool written in rust for Texter(programmer)(github.com)

   3 points by lispre 7y ago|3 comments
4. 4.▲
   by lispre 8y ago

   No, it is still bad. Rust is not for good c/c++ programmer. It is for those who is not familiar with c/c++ but have some knowledge with functional programming. As a C++ programmer, you can try golang instead of for productive
5. 5.▲
   by lispre 8y ago

   Rust is not for common project. Rust is only for safety. I just recommend modern C++ and golang
6. 6.▲
   by lispre 8y ago

   Just as the data offered by this article, the best choice for the practical job right now should be Golang and OCaml. if you don't love the two, just try C/C++.
7. 7.▲
   Why is lisp still popular with some yong people in Japan?

   7 points by lispre 8y ago|0 comments
8. 8.▲
   by lispre 8y ago

   Really? Picolisp was build with asm? not C as SBCL