lisivka

16 ms·

61.
by lisivka 10y ago
My favorite: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yX8EYfGDyXg .
62.
by lisivka 10y ago
IMHO, Stern-Gerlach experiment demonstrates interaction of magnet field with guiding wave mediated via particle, so I expect that magnet will steer particle-wave into same spots, thus will demonstrate «quantum» behavior of particle spin at
63.
by lisivka 10y ago
Add Kiva to your list. ;-)
64.
by lisivka 10y ago
Sorry, I cannot follow you here. Maybe it's well known thought experiment, but I'm unable to find it.
65.
by lisivka 10y ago
Lets define experiment as following (excuse me my bad English, please): - vibrating bath with non-conductive, non-magnetic, non-paramagnetic, non-diamagnetic fluid; - vibrating bath is wide enough to avoid excessive interference with refle
66.
by lisivka 10y ago
It's very unlikely. If Dave has Carol diary, then Carol made the trip already, so Carol will notice empty fuel tanks and big holes in the shield. She will may have problems with memory, but she is not stupid.
67.
by lisivka 10y ago
I asking about outcome of Stern and Gerlach experiment. It's binary thing. Make public prediction, please.
68.
by lisivka 10y ago
No, it's not a time travel. Bob will see that Carol travels backward and Carol will see that Bob travel backward, like we see EM emission from FTL electron in reverse order. FTL electron is not moving back in time, nor Bob or Ca
69.
by lisivka 10y ago
> From the perspective of Bob, Carol would have traveled backwards, going from Y to X. So what? It's Bobs problem. FTL electrons, in medium where speed of light is much less than c, are traveling exactly as you described.
70.
by lisivka 10y ago
By sending a message in two opposite directions, we can achieve 2c speed of information transfer. How that is possible?
71.
by lisivka 10y ago
Nobody even tried to entangle two walkers. AFAIK, uncharged non-magnetic particle without any inclusions (e.g. bubbles) has spin and phase of vibration only. How to entangle them? Moreover, spin is 3d, walker is 2d, phase is 1d, while our U
72.
by lisivka 10y ago
So, your prediction for walker droplet spin is that walkers, in kind of Stern and Gerlach experiment, will behave like classical magnets, not like quantum particles, right?
73.
by lisivka 10y ago
Nobody tells that walkers are simulate all quantum behavior and doing that correctly. However, they helps to understand some of quantum puzzles. For example, droplets have spin. Can you predict behavior of the classical droplet spin in comp
74.
by lisivka 10y ago
All four companies have success with their own programming languages, which is not an easy task to do. Some of them are also succeed with their own OSes too, which is even harder. They CAN replace JS if they push a language strong enough. T
75.
by lisivka 10y ago
I'm not saying that risk is not reduced. I'm saying SELinux is not effective, so it's better to spent my time/money on something that can reduce risk significantly. I saw no 0-day exploits to date which are stopped by SE
76.
by lisivka 10y ago
Did you saw double slit experiment reproduction in 2D macro?: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsaUX48t0w8 Observer breaks interference pattern.
77.
by lisivka 10y ago
- Loop quantum gravity: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loop_quantum_gravity
78.
by lisivka 10y ago
Yes, you are right. However, when I calculating risks and protection/price ratio, I see no difference. System with `setenforce 0` is equal to system with the rule for first two significant digit, because root password is most significa
79.
by lisivka 10y ago
Of course, I know that. But companies are rich. They both have their own major browsers. They can just pay to Mozilla and Apple (two remaining major browsers) to support their language(s). Libraries are not a problem for .Net, Go, Swift,
80.
by lisivka 10y ago
I recommend to install mc (Midnigth Commander) and bash-completion (if bash is your shell of choice) as first terminal tools. mc allows to explore system efficiently while not standing in my way, because I can always press ctrl-O and get my
81.
by lisivka 10y ago
M$ and Google tried to undermine JS with their own languages (VisualBasic and Dart) but failed. Why such rich companies cannot make a better language?
82.
by lisivka 10y ago
Car is dangerous. It's easy to kill someone by accident using car, just by pressing accelerator pedal long enough. Just compare number of killed or injured by a car and by a weapon. Car is still the most dangerous thing we have: http:
83.
by lisivka 10y ago
Because parts of SELinux which are easy to use are already covered by POSIX.
84.
by lisivka 10y ago
Yeah, but it's basically same as `setenforce 0`.
85.
by lisivka 10y ago
If someone is killed by your gun and you don't tell who, you will be jailed at least.
86.
by lisivka 10y ago
Is potential profit for Science and whole our civilization low in case of Hadron Collider?
87.
by lisivka 10y ago
Skipped steps are called "high-tech".
88.
by lisivka 10y ago
Why not to write generator of init scripts from Systemd unit files? Unit files are well documented for typical options and are easy to write.
89.
by lisivka 10y ago
«Foo is garbage» is not a valid criticism.
90.
by lisivka 10y ago
Use `set -x` or `bash -x script.sh` to trace shell script execution. Shell scripts are easy to debug.

More ›