linuxdude314

9 ms·

61.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
Are you bragging about your long term section 8 housing status?
62.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
Pretty much all SaaS products charge per unique user, not active sessions, so I don’t really understand what point you’re trying to convey.
63.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
Are they supposed to just know the blankets are in your closet?
64.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
I have absolutely none of the problems you are describing with VSCode. You have an immense amount of control over VSCode and its plugin ecosystem is fantastic. This sounds like more of a problem with your workstation or environment.
65.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
Agree 100%. This is the way (or use SCP).
66.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
Writing code in nano is so asinine and such a huge red flag.
67.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
I don’t understand why so many people in these comments are claiming text editors are “hard” to learn. Software engineers that went to college have taken Calculus, Physics, and other advanced courses that can be very hard for many to learn.
68.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
Have you ever sat down for an hour and tried to learn? If you’re familiar with Unix tools a lot of the syntax should be familiar (like string substitutions). Having been a math tutor in the past, I pretty firmly believe anyone is capable of
69.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
Thats because wherever you downloaded it isn’t in PATH. If you don’t want to use brew and want it available everywhere just set PATH=$PATH:<location of script>
70.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
Nano is not a powerful text editor and is generally only used by non sophisticated users.
71.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
You might like x!
72.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
You make some excellent points. Unfortunately most hardware at some point ends up in this state.
73.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
Agreed. Nano use is somewhat of a red flag to me. It’s SO inefficient in comparison to Vim, VSCode, or tons of other alternatives. If it’s the only thing on the box, fine, but in reality usually Vim is the only editor installed.
74.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
If your company isn't building a product based on terraform, why are you doing anything?
75.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
I doubt that’s what would happen if they could afford a license from Hashicorp. Avoiding proprietary licenses has its place but if you aren’t using terraform to build a product this really shouldn’t impact you much.
76.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
Its a joke.
77.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
When it comes to implementing low level code using instructions and registers, nothing beats the data sheet. You don't need any opinions or tutorials, just a knowledge of how the chip works (it's in the data sheet), and the instr
78.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
That’s what it’s for but a lot of us don’t like the added complexity. It would be ideal if it was built in to the language.
79.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
What are you talking about? The whole point is you leave it on and it tracks the sun. Does this not work for you?
80.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
No it’s not and its use should not be perpetuated in this context. It’s definitely the homophobia you are perceiving. No one misses the edge lords of yesteryear.
81.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
I think you're missing the point of why we make power grids instead of simply having city local generators or stations. The whole purpose of interconnecting power generation sources is to be able to accommodate for dynamic demand and e
82.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
This is already done, just not at great scale. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconducting_wire For detailed information about one actually built and used: https://www.furukawa.co.jp/review/fr035
83.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
I'm really curious where you found "spire lines of code". I can't find anything for that in a google search. What does that mean?
84.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
If a single line item that seems irrelevant to you makes you think the whole process of security hardening is useless, you are a fool. Frankly you sound like the tired BOFH trope, if you don't see the benefits of security hardening I h
85.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
The way I see it is we only want to use TF for setting up "base infrastructure". This is things like our VPC networks, cloud routers, firewall rules, and finally our Kubernetes clusters. We still allow devs to use TF, but it&#x27
86.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
Let's say you need to configure a provider for 3 different regions. The natural way you want to do this is store the regions in a variable, and iterate over the variable using "for_each". What you are referring to are called
87.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
It just means "source lines of code". "losc" sort of makes more sense with how we are used to speaking, but it's not as easy to pronounce as "sloc".
88.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
This doesn’t have anything to do with AWS, this has to do with terraform not allowing you to dynamically instantiate providers. The same thing happens with the Kubernetes provider when you try to use it with multiple GKE clusters.
89.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
The primary thing terragrunt was designed to do was let you dynamically render providers. Terraform still does not let you this. It becomes very problematic when using providers that are region specific, amongst other scenarios. That being
90.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
You’re not wrong. You can achieve the same results using modules well. It’s common for an entire environment for a whole biz unit or even company to be a single “stack”. This pretty much only works if the “terraform apply” is centrally orch

More ›