linuxdude314

21 ms·

91.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
100% As long as you are using Debian, RHEL, Ubuntu, or CentOS implementing a basic minimum security baseline is as simple as following the CIS or DISA STIG guides for your OS. There are plenty of scripts on GitHub that do this (AUDIT THEM F
92.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
You must be using the wrong 'checklists' (they aren't checklists, they are implementation guidelines). CIS benchmarks and DISA STIGs provide concrete actions that lead to a more secure system. Sure some of them might not app
93.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
077 is a bit too restrictive for a lot of workloads. 027 is recommended by CIS for servers and 022 for desktop. If you are sure you can use 077 without stuff breaking, awesome, but that's not always the case. Typically on systems usin
94.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
It's really not weird, that's not how security works. What the application is doing is relevant to application security, but the whole point of securing the OS is to eliminate the necessity for "trusting" the application
95.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
Ingress is free for AWS. Doesn’t make any sense to charge for ingress…
96.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
It sounds like you might have a permissions issue. You can route issues created from Jira Service Desk to any board you want.
97.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
Normal for lots of companies even domestic. Remote companies still have to be able to receive mail to their registered agent (legal requirement).
98.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
It sounds like you’re conflating IDPs with other technology. Istio is a service mesh that can be used to bolt on a proxy that requires authz/authn, but Istio itself is not managing the users or groups. It communicates with whatever ID
99.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
When designing a tool, scalability should be a feature not a requirement. There isn't so much value in creating scalable tools these days as they exist in abundance. What is rarer and more useful are tools that are easy to use at small
100.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
What are you talking about? Wrong thread?
101.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
They shot themselves in the foot majorly on this one. When you realize that one of your products isn’t being heavily used and is OSS, you don’t close source it, you keep it open! This shows that the value add of the paid product is actually
102.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
Announcing a major change like this in a PR screams disregard for your users. Are you sure this isn’t just a way for you to crack down on license abuse?
103.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
Agreed; this is somewhat useful for beginners but incredibly silly for professionals.
104.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
It’s very sketchy that they use stderr and queries for training. Don’t pass anything sensitive into this program!
105.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
It’s insane… I’m still shocked this isn’t trolling.
106.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
A lot of people in the comments here don’t seem to understand the difference between the two.
107.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
Same. This is amateurish math at best. Defining a new derivative operator that is mathematically equivalent to the normal derivative operator and then reformulating physics equations as some way to prevent human error is beyond absurd.
108.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
Due to the fact differential operators are linear and the nature of the accumulation of constants of integration it’s pretty easy to prove that the differential operator proposed is in fact equivalent to the standard derivative operator. So
109.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
This is the way! Introduce all the constants you need. Don’t redefine functions and operators for syntactic sugar.
110.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
If you mean units instead of dimensions I agree. There is a natural reason for pi occurring in physics that makes little sense to ignore. Treating it as something to be dealt with misses the forest for the trees. Radians are the naturally o
111.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
Is this really not an elaborate troll? Arguing that a literal mathematical equivalence (e^i x = e^2pi ix) that you then use to “redefine“ trig functions so you can reformulate physics to mitigate making errors dividing my a constant is comp
112.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
The level of ignorance many developers have these days about foundational technologies that power SaaS platforms is truly astounding. Hopefully there are still people around to build SaaS when the current vanguard retires.
113.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
More likely those people were somewhat junior. It makes no sense to interchange a vendor with a technology unless the name is literally the same. Isilon for instance was a brand where there main product was... Isilon clusters.
114.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
That's typically what RedHat does... If you're a big account you get your own Technical Account Manager (TAM) and a dedicated support engineer. This is like bread and butter for anyone with any experience in enterprise. How is HN
115.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
Very old.
116.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
I'm kind of shocked the average HN user seems to be so incredibly ignorant on this matter. Is this an ego thing?
117.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
The purpose of Rocky is to be bug-for-bug compatible with RHEL. What makes you think they would ever attempt to upstream something?
118.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
Have you tried getting support from RedHat as an actual enterprise customer rather than an SMB? Obviously if you pay for the lowest level of support, that's what you are going to get. Serious businesses pay for dedicated account resou
119.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
To be honest, you sound more like recent college graduate with minimal (no) experience working in enterprise. You probably don't realize this given your lack of experience, but when you are running FOSS powered/adjacent enterprise
120.
by linuxdude314 3y ago
That’s a longer subject that fits in a comment here. If you are _actually_ interested I suggest using google search to find some good sites that go over what a column oriented database does/is used for. This isn’t hard; I’ll get you st

More ›