linkgoron

7 ms·

31.
by linkgoron 4y ago
Yep, I've recently used Vue instead of React and I hate the magical templating system. Slots, magical rules for variable scoping etc. The templating is IMO way worse than JSX. I don't care for React one bit, but IMO JSX is the hig
32.
by linkgoron 4y ago
The dates were known in advance - however, the Node.js team expected OpenSSL 3 to be out before the release of Node 16, but it didn't happen - so they had to release with OpenSSL 1.1.1. I think that there was some minor hope of maybe u
33.
by linkgoron 4y ago
I think that this is a quite harsh. The EOL for Node 16 is more than a year away, there's a good reason for the EOL change, and Node 18 will be LTS almost a year by then.
34.
by linkgoron 4y ago
It's quite easy to understand how face-masks reduce the amount of saliva that's released into the air in a room when someone coughs or talks, and there's also a reason why masks are used in hospitals and in operating rooms wa
35.
by linkgoron 4y ago
Maybe it has something to do with a new virus going around, there was also an increase in 2020... There's a reason why they're comparing 2021 to 2018/2019 and not to 2020.
36.
by linkgoron 4y ago
The result looks relatively weak IMO. The numbers are less impressive then what they seem, and IMO the numbers look like they were computed in a way that resulted in what the authors wanted. For example, weekly counts of cardiac arrest call
37.
by linkgoron 5y ago
I believe that React's hooks implementation is sub-par, not that "a" hooks implementation wouldn't work. Their current implementation badly needs a real compiler (the whole dependencies array stuff is atrocious, as well
38.
by linkgoron 5y ago
Hooks are not simple at all, are very error prone, and definitely do not put the user in the "pit of success". JSX is terrific, but React has only gone backwards since classes IMO.
39.
by linkgoron 6y ago
You can always use something like dependabot, which should help you quickly upgrade versions and also protect you from breaking your build.
40.
by linkgoron 7y ago
And the article states clearly: "[the Core i9-9900KS] does pull out ahead in a number of ST tests as well as in low resolution (CPU-bound) gaming." Regarding the geomean, they clearly state that their benchmarks prioritize multi-c
41.
by linkgoron 7y ago
First of all, the 9900k doesn't cost half the money. Second, you can also buy a 3900x if you want 12 threads with similar ST characteristics and pricing closer to the 9900k. There are other options. If you want to game @ 1080p and do m
42.
by linkgoron 7y ago
You could just buy a CPU for a third or fourth of the price if you want to just browse. You don't need a $750 16-core CPU. You can buy a $200 9600KF or a $240 3600x or something even cheaper. For anything multi-core the 3950X blows the