lindenksv1

6 ms·

1.
AI and the Digital Content Provider's Dilemma(katedowninglaw.com)
3 points by lindenksv1 1y ago|0 comments
2.
by lindenksv1 3y ago
I am a lawyer and tried to find this new language but none of the legal documents I looked at appear to be updated to reflect any of this. Microsoft has a lot of different docs and it's a little confusing but the ones for Copilot are s
3.
Did GitHub just offer to indemnify you for Copilot's suggestions?(katedowninglaw.com)
3 points by lindenksv1 3y ago|0 comments
4.
by lindenksv1 4y ago
OP here. If you own the copyright to a work, you can license it in any way you like. You can offer it to some people under a commercial license and to other people under an open source license. Many entities practices dual (or tri or whatev
5.
by lindenksv1 4y ago
Kate Downing here. This is an excellent question. So, just like YouTube, GitHub would likely argue that they are protected by the DMCA and that so long as they comply with DMCA take-down requests, they are not liable for copyright infringem
6.
The Great Open Source Shake-Up(medium.com)
2 points by lindenksv1 7y ago|0 comments
7.
Part 2: The GPL Cooperation Commitment – Coincidentally Great for Lawyers(katedowninglaw.com)
3 points by lindenksv1 7y ago|0 comments
8.
Part 1: The Dark Practice of Free and Open Source Software Law(katedowninglaw.com)
3 points by lindenksv1 7y ago|0 comments
9.
CommunityBridge: Probably Not What You Were Hoping For(medium.com)
2 points by lindenksv1 8y ago|0 comments
10.
by lindenksv1 10y ago
The problem is that they continue to be pushed out further and further from their jobs every year because cities like Palo Alto keep adding thousands of jobs and almost no housing. That means professionals like me get pushed out of PA, move
11.
by lindenksv1 10y ago
The point is that if two professional salaries aren't enough to buy a home in Palo Alto, then it highlights how much everyone else must be struggling. It highlights just how far away all of our service workers must live. Highlights jus
12.
by lindenksv1 10y ago
I think you're missing the forest for the trees. Yes, I personally can go live 30 minutes away. So how far away should the teachers live, then? The police? Because if I can afford San Mateo, then that means they largely can't. So
13.
by lindenksv1 10y ago
You can only build multifamily housing in 3% of the city. It's illegal everywhere else. You can't build more than 3 stories in most places - it's illegal. The supreme cost of housing here comes partially from the fact that yo
14.
by lindenksv1 10y ago
The problem in the Bay Area is that since 2010, we added about 500,000 jobs and only 50,000 housing units. Roughly speaking, jobs gives you a sense for demand and housing units give you a sense for supply. Our jobs-housing ratio is complete
15.
by lindenksv1 10y ago
It didn't when we were looking. We didn't see a single property come up on the downtown side of El Camino. We would have liked that, but we didn't see it. And also $2M would also not have been within the band we were looking
16.
by lindenksv1 10y ago
Business relationships are also relationships. The first people a small company hires are the people they're friends with or friendly with. The people who invest in you are more likely to be your social acquaintances or friends. You wo
17.
by lindenksv1 10y ago
It's not a privilege or a right. But it's a smart policy that will make us all richer, healthier, and more environmentally friendly. You can read more here: https://medium.com/b-copy-com-longform-content/why-c
18.
by lindenksv1 10y ago
NO ONE is talking about the city providing anyone with housing. This is not about government subsidized housing. It's just about the city allowing people to build housing on the land that they own. Just permitting people to build.
19.
by lindenksv1 10y ago
Yes, I can rent. I can rent until I die. But how bizarre is it that you are telling me and everyone else who isn't wealth enough to have bought a house yet that we "insist" on buying and we should be happy to rent forever wh
20.
by lindenksv1 10y ago
Don't be discouraged! YIMBY groups are popping up all over the Bay Area working to make a difference in their cities. Join a group's mailing list and show up at your city council when they ask you to. Easy. Bring enough friends an
21.
by lindenksv1 10y ago
The problem with the "will of the people" is outlined here pretty well: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/08/10/why-c... A small minority of NIMBY homeowners can captur
22.
by lindenksv1 10y ago
Industries are successful when they cluster. It's why you see entertainment in LA, insurance in Chicago, biotech in North Carolina, banks in NY, and think tanks and defense contractors in DC. As we move away from manufacturing and into
23.
by lindenksv1 10y ago
There is no free market in housing. Supply is very tightly constrained by the city via a system of very stringent zoning (3 stories max most of the city, only 3% of the city is even zone for multifamily housing) and taxes. What you see happ
24.
by lindenksv1 10y ago
We're moving to Santa Cruz because we wanted to live in a walkable area. If you travel up and down the peninsula, any house near the walkable downtown area is going to be $2M+. Yeah, sure, you can buy for less and have to travel by car
25.
by lindenksv1 10y ago
Hey there. I'm Kate Downing. I don't insist on living in Palo Alto at all. See? I'm moving. But what I'm trying to say is that we have a serious problem because people who are integral to our community who SHOULDN'T
26.
by lindenksv1 10y ago
This article misses the forest for the trees - the question of why we have a housing deficit in the first place. And it's not because thousands of coastal cities forgot to build housing and only the author noticed. It's because th
27.
by lindenksv1 11y ago
On "why can't those people move to___?" https://medium.com/b-copy-com-longform-content/why-can-t-tho...