lima

30 ms·

481.
by lima 6y ago
What's the argument for anomaly detection - it's an obvious thing to do that has been tried many times, but doesn't actually seem to provide much value in practice (especially at large scale, where you'll get spurious co
482.
by lima 6y ago
But they also modified the mRNA structure to make it more durable (but still on the order of days/weeks).
483.
by lima 6y ago
Wouldn't the low bluetooth bitrate eliminate most of the advantage?
484.
by lima 6y ago
A PR is roughly the same as a stack of Gerrit CLs. The difference is that Gerrit tracks the evolution of, and reviews, each individual commit. With a PR, you lose history when rebasing and all commits have to be approved as a whole.
485.
by lima 6y ago
Patches would still have a base, it's really more about about the data model. It's possible to synthesize a GitHub PR from a Gerrit CL and vice-versa. In fact, Gerrit is entirely based on Git and you can simply clone any given CL.
486.
by lima 6y ago
Note that those points are particular disadvantages of the email workflow - all of these things are solved in modern tools like Gerrit.
487.
by lima 6y ago
A patch/diff workflow operates at the level of individual diffs, rather than a branch identified by base and head refs like with pull requests. Email is one (very clunky) way of implementing such a workflow, there's other tools li
488.
by lima 6y ago
In Germany (and probably all of Europe), it is forbidden by law.
489.
by lima 6y ago
> It’s actually very convenient now to stack GitHub PRs More convenient than before, but nowhere near as convenient as keeping everything on a single branch so that it can be rebased in one go.
490.
by lima 6y ago
In somewhat related news, Gerrit has a new frontend and it's awesome! Google has a couple of UX people working on it now and it shows. As a big fan of patch-based code review, I still can't stand GitHub PRs. It's very annoyin
491.
Applications that run Chromium with –no-sandbox(github.com)
2 points by lima 6y ago|0 comments
492.
by lima 6y ago
> for 90% of my chats, all I need is "good enough" security which both iMessage and Telegram True for iMessage, but not for Telegram. Telegram has great UX, but does not use end-to-end encryption. (Telegram's "secre
493.
by lima 6y ago
> so we have broken into each business, and fixed the locks ourselves ... which is not what happened. And - "open door" metaphors do not work well for cybersecurity due to an entirely different threat model. These vulnerable
494.
by lima 6y ago
> For over 90% of workloads kubernetes is an overkill. Only when company is reaching google scale kubernetes make sense. I hear people repeating this truism all day, but from practical experience, it doesn't seem to be the case -
495.
by lima 6y ago
> I couldn't understand why the ex-Amazon cloud lead was also in charge of Slack. When he made all channels private and put a Slackbot in every channel to monitor conversations, I knew it was all over. I'm worried his Slackbot
496.
by lima 6y ago
The data is still useful in aggregate.
497.
by lima 6y ago
Yes. There's a Chrome extension that does it and a couple user scripts: https://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/144258/slacks-we...
498.
by lima 6y ago
Slack, too. Slack has a perfectly good workspace sidebar in their web app, but they hide it unless you're on a Chromebook (where you can't install their native app).
499.
by lima 6y ago
The friend who invited me was (and is) a happy member - he skips the large meetings/gatherings and simply uses the network to find folk with similar interests.
500.
by lima 6y ago
Yes. It's a weird bunch (not in a bad way!). I went to their meetings a couple times by invitation, and it never really "clicked" - for many of their members, their MENSA membership and related activities are a big part of th
501.
by lima 6y ago
The real competition to Coinbase are liquidity pools like Uniswap and on-chain order book exchanges like Serum. Coinbase is only needed to get fiat in/out.
502.
by lima 6y ago
Exactly.
503.
by lima 6y ago
Any observable behavior will be depended upon. A breaking change is a breaking change no matter what. Of course it's good that they fixed the UB.
504.
by lima 6y ago
What would they need a firewall for? They have full control over the entire environment. They can (and should) just filter host-side.
505.
GitHub is serving broken CSS
4 points by lima 6y ago|2 comments
506.
by lima 6y ago
Good question - the appears to be "no", since it has a clear origin and meaning unrelated to master/slave relationships.
507.
by lima 6y ago
> Kubernetes, Helm and cloud-platform specific quirks were a godsend that cemented in this status for at least another decade. Quite to the contrary - containers and Kubernetes are standardizing and commoditizing builds, deployments an
508.
by lima 6y ago
> Next time you're debugging connection issues between your canary webserver kubernetes deployment and redis cluster misc-3, ask yourself: are we serving more traffic than stack overflow? Kubernetes is a configuration management s
509.
by lima 6y ago
Yeah... I bet today was the security team's "told you so" day.
510.
by lima 6y ago
> Does PoS actually work today? AFAICS it's vaporware. Yes. PoS chains using real practical byzantine fault tolerance like Cosmos Hub, using Tendermint consensus, have been running since 2018.

More ›