lilei2

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by lilei2 9y ago

   I guess they most be using something in front of the code [0] (which do document the double slash issue). Probably should have used PathUnescape[1] on line 185 though. [0] https://github.com/letsencrypt/boulder/blo
2. 2.▲
   by lilei2 9y ago

   I don't like it either. What I'm saying is that this is something people who support net neutrality has to be able to refute. Most consumers only want slow traffic to many websites and fast access to a few websites, but the are pa
3. 3.▲
   by lilei2 9y ago

   Blame? It's more about curiosity. The poster said "OCSP requests that use the GET method use standard base64 encoding, which can contain two slashes one after another", so I'm wondering if that's that case or it&#x2
4. 4.▲
   by lilei2 9y ago

   I'm not sure I understand how slash collapsing is affecting this. Slash is a reserved character and presumably if it the data was correctly encoded should never have ended up in the URI in the first place? (I guess this is more a quest
5. 5.▲
   by lilei2 9y ago

   I don't really follow this: > First, it confuses technological innovation (impressive to engineers) and economic innovation (valuable to consumers). Second, it confuses gross and net benefit — of course, when government does X, we g
6. 6.▲
   by lilei2 9y ago

   What you're describing is how net neutrality works, not how the Internet works. > First, bandwidth is limited. It's whatever download and upload you sign for. I said that I don't encourage bandwidth limits, not that it was
7. 7.▲
   by lilei2 9y ago

   I realized that it's pretty fruitless to discuss these things on HN, but since you responded I will give you a response. This isn't something that is generally happening, at least not outside mobile connectivity where certain serv