likeabbas

10 ms·

91.
by likeabbas 3y ago
> Doesn't this seem like science-fiction driven psyops? This whole thing is *way* weirder than anything else I’ve ever experienced in my life. This certainly could be one giant psy-op, but then we have to wonder why it would go so d
92.
by likeabbas 3y ago
You’re not directly saying Grusch is unwell, but you’re certainly insinuating it. And you’re dodging the other facts, like the ICIG deeming the claims as credible and [urgent (50 U.S.C. § 3033(k)(5)(G))]( https://www.law.corne
93.
by likeabbas 3y ago
Would you mind emailing Gary (gnolan@drowlab.com) with your concerns? I’ve gotten a response from him on some concerns I had with an interview he did. He’s a very nice fellow and he tries to respond to every inquiry from w what I understand
94.
by likeabbas 3y ago
You can find discrepancies in anything if you want to enough. I can’t convince you of anything because all of the data is classified or under HIPPA. All we can do is trust the highly credentialed people about their general findings. Gary No
95.
by likeabbas 3y ago
Are you going to assume the IC Inspector General is unwell too since they referred Grusch’s claims to congress as being both urgent and credible ?
96.
by likeabbas 3y ago
This situation may be a bit different. Trump was president and the clearance system begins and ends with his authority. He dictated Flynn and Kushner receipt Top Secret SCI clearances despite them not being able to pass the background check
97.
by likeabbas 3y ago
Some of that is divulged in the original article https://thedebrief.org/intelligence-officials-say-u-s-has-re...
98.
by likeabbas 3y ago
Do you have a source on that? Did very highly credentialed and trusted intelligence officers come out and testify under oath that there were satanic sex cults? There is a big difference here. Grusch has given specific locations and names of
99.
by likeabbas 3y ago
Professor Gary Nolan of Stanford doesn’t seem to think Havana syndrome is a “non event” considering he was contacted by the CIA to do brain scans of the victims. I agree it’s frustrating because the entire situation is classified, but this
100.
by likeabbas 3y ago
Because of this specific section > The new UAP language (found in Section 1104 of the bill) would require "any person currently or formerly under contract with the Federal Government that has in their possession material or informat
101.
by likeabbas 3y ago
Why are you ignoring the fact that the senators have been convinced to add provisions regarding "non-earth origin" technology. That's a significant claim
102.
by likeabbas 3y ago
Gillibrand's actions are speaking louder than what she's saying. https://douglasjohnson.ghost.io/senate-intelligence-bill-giv...
103.
by likeabbas 3y ago
The Havana syndrome stuff is still highly classified. From what I’ve heard, there’s something going on there.
104.
by likeabbas 3y ago
No, I just don’t like being compared to someone believing something blind. If Grusch was alleging that there are undisclosed programs reverse engineering other country technology, it would be taken seriously. But the subject brings stigma a
105.
by likeabbas 3y ago
Again, why would congress include these provisions in the next NDAA if they didn’t think Grusch’s comments held enough weight?
106.
by likeabbas 3y ago
I would argue the situation here is different. Clapper used politically adept language to avoid saying what surveillance capabilities the NSA possessed. Here, David Grusch has given specific program names, locations, and people involved wit
107.
by likeabbas 3y ago
I understand, and I'm trying to explain how your options don't make sense in the context of the senators' recent actions. I take offense to your edit. I'm not being a religious zealot saying God has to exist. If you unde
108.
by likeabbas 3y ago
They might be possibilities. But, the senate intelligence committee recently passed an amendment to the NDAA 2024 just 3 weeks after Grusch went public to include the following: > The new UAP language (found in Section 1104 of the bill)
109.
by likeabbas 3y ago
Explain this to me: Why would the senate intelligence committee pass an amendment to the NDAA 2024 just 3 weeks after Grusch's allegations went public that include the following: > "a comprehensive list of all non-earth origin
110.
by likeabbas 3y ago
> they might be lying and it's not a big government psy-op Why would he lie to congress under oath? He would go to jail. > deluded or caught up in a hysteria about things that are neither psy-ops nor the things that they say the
111.
by likeabbas 3y ago
To try to catch hacker news up to the situation: David Grusch, A former NGA intelligence officer has recently come forward with allegations that there are waived, unacknowledged Special Access Programs that are reverse engineering non-human
112.
by likeabbas 3y ago
Not a lot of its using firecracker https://firecracker-microvm.github.io/
113.
by likeabbas 3y ago
This is a great mindset. I was forced to move from NYC to the bumfuck Midwest because of my girlfriend’s job, and I hate it here. Yes I own a house with a yard, but I’d trade it for my apartment in Manhattan any day of the week. Density mak
114.
by likeabbas 3y ago
Our prevailing theory of quantum mechanics is QFT which suggests that there aren’t actually any individual particles, but fields that experience excitations which act like individual particles. If we find that gravity is also just a field a
115.
by likeabbas 3y ago
The Alcubierre drive gets around this by bending the spacetime around a craft so that portion of space is moving and not the craft through space. And beyond that, traversable wormholes aren’t completely ruled out yet
116.
by likeabbas 3y ago
You left one portion out of the explanation of the Casimir effect > The Casimir effect shows that quantum field theory allows the energy density in certain regions of space to be negative relative to the ordinary vacuum energy, and it ha
117.
by likeabbas 3y ago
https://phys.org/news/2017-04-physicists-violate-local-causa... is one
118.
by likeabbas 3y ago
User-friendly is subjective. I think it would be more user friendly to tell users "hey, this code you're writing can't be verified by the compiler" rather than "hey, this code is unsafe. beware"
119.
by likeabbas 3y ago
It's just an example. There's plenty of backend "engineers" who don't really engineer anything. This all leads back to a conversation one of my professors talked about. In other engineering professions, you need to
120.
by likeabbas 3y ago
There's plenty of "engineers" whose job is to update some trivial frontend code or similar that will be automated away. I think software engineer salaries are about to tank really quick.

More ›