lgm_

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by lgm_ 9y ago

   Agreed, you are not the first to give this feedback. I'll work on that, it should be available tomorrow.
2. 2.▲
   by lgm_ 9y ago

   Indeed, it's small (88KB) and silent, but I shouldn't do that on mobile. I've just removed it.
3. 3.▲
   by lgm_ 9y ago

   No, it's not OOS, but I'm thinking about it. Why not? I saw that as a useful to quickly prototype an idea. But I'm not yet sure frankly.
4. 4.▲
   by lgm_ 9y ago

   It's only 88KB, but I should not display the video on mobile indeed. I'm removing it right now.
5. 5.▲
   by lgm_ 9y ago

   Very cool, thanks for the link! I've also seen extensions of Markdown (CommonMark generic directives) that I could use instead of the syntax I made up.
6. 6.▲
   by lgm_ 9y ago

   That's indeed a valid question. I think it's quite a bit simpler than HTML, albeit not by a huge factor. I think that that makes a difference, as the relative success of Markdown shows. But I agree I might be wrong, we'll see
7. 7.▲
   by lgm_ 9y ago

   I completely agree, I'm thinking about that. I should probably specify the grammar and make my tm->html converter open source. And probably allow to store on a personal git repo so that nobody is afraid to be locked in. So many inte
8. 8.▲
   Markdown and mock = textmock(textmock.net)

   71 points by lgm_ 9y ago|29 comments