lexicon0

4 ms·

1.
by lexicon0 6y ago
Why would I pay at least 450 euro per month for something I have to run myself? I appreciate that support and maintenance costs are certainly something to pay for, but a high monthly charge when I'm taking all the risk, and paying for
2.
by lexicon0 6y ago
> Also I'm a bit confused by your stance given the realities of encryption. Does your network strictly block all outbound traffic that it can't actively MITM? If not, a nefarious employee could proxy their criminal (Tor or othe
3.
by lexicon0 6y ago
I'm adding my thought that hosting a website on Tor primarily, will make it totally unavailable from many workplaces. Currently, Tor is not the place for a site that doesn't _require_ an extremely high level of anonymity of access
4.
by lexicon0 6y ago
Financial services, but I suspect any business that provides hardware & software to it's employees would take the same view.
5.
by lexicon0 6y ago
There is no legitimate use for it in this context, and as such, every single instance of it has been associated with a crime, mostly CSAM.
6.
by lexicon0 6y ago
I'm in charge of a security for a reasonable sized company. I generally support the Tor project and the goals of having a surveillance free internet. However - if an employee would install tor browser or use tor on a company device, or
7.
by lexicon0 6y ago
I wonder how many other 5000+ employee companies that develop their own remote access software have an entire separate redundant system..
8.
Ripple20(jsof-tech.com)
7 points by lexicon0 6y ago|0 comments