lexiathan

4 ms·

1.
by lexiathan 8mo ago
The examples that I chose for my benchmark demonstrate that Lexiathan maintains accuracy and performance even on severely degraded input. On less corrupted input, Lexiathan runs significantly faster and is even more accurate. Lexiathan also
2.
by lexiathan 8mo ago
Hi wolfgarbe, I don't believe my benchmark of SymSpell is misleading. I used the webassembly repository that is listed on your github: https://github.com/justinwilaby/spellchecker-wasm Here is the code I used for
3.
Show HN: A spell-checker 380x faster than Hunspell, 5x faster than SymSpell(lexiathan.com)
3 points by lexiathan 8mo ago|4 comments
4.
by lexiathan 8mo ago
For the curious: The article doesn't name the ally, but is probably referring to Qatar, which hosts the Al-Udeid Air Base, where the USAF has a significant presence. Geographically, the US could potentially strike Iran from Qatar; they
5.
by lexiathan 8mo ago
I'll add it to my list!
6.
by lexiathan 8mo ago
It probably did damage the runway a bit, but given that these ancient planes are no longer in production, the cost to repair whatever damage was done to the plane (looks pretty extensive, from the video) is likely much more expensive than w
7.
by lexiathan 8mo ago
In defense of the students: the types of films that you watch as part of a film study curriculum are generally not the same as what most cinema-goers are watching. For example, "Man with a Movie Camera"--or 150 minutes of someone&
8.
by lexiathan 8mo ago
I thought about doing this sort of thing a while back by parsing code into an AST + using a debugger API. Using an LLM is an interesting approach, but I would be concerned whether (a) it is reliable and (b) whether it is deterministic and r