letstryagain

20 ms·

151.
by letstryagain 13y ago
LinkedIn is at the very bottom of the list when it comes to stuff like this. If you don't expect the worst from them you've not been paying attention.
152.
by letstryagain 13y ago
The major sites don't do this. We know because many people out there collect literally millions of poker hands observed on these sites and mine the data for every kind of statistic you can think of. If anything significant was out of w
153.
by letstryagain 13y ago
If Apple allows banking apps they should allow Bitcoin apps, I don't see the problem.
154.
by letstryagain 13y ago
Android is the wild west compared to iOS
155.
by letstryagain 13y ago
> How did regulation stop the latest market bubble related to the housing bubble and false ratings for derivatives? Deregulation starting in the Clinton era?
156.
by letstryagain 13y ago
Get one of those temporary tattoos that fade away after a couple of weeks
157.
by letstryagain 13y ago
It's amazingly sad and predictable Google has become.
158.
by letstryagain 13y ago
Do you have a blog? Or one you like?
159.
by letstryagain 13y ago
Accept the ticket and have it squashed later?
160.
by letstryagain 13y ago
I don't think this uses GPS. A high-end CNC machine would have about 0% chance of seeing any GPS satellites. Even the linked thread said it uses gyros without mentioning GPS.
161.
by letstryagain 13y ago
Are we complaining about generics again?
162.
by letstryagain 13y ago
Almost but not exactly. The situation in the Netherlands is more complicated. Technically it's still illegal, however it's effectively decriminalised for personal use. Small amounts found on you (less than 5 grams) will not be pro
163.
by letstryagain 13y ago
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQ4yd2W50No#t=16
164.
by letstryagain 13y ago
Yes, I have seen traditional taxis drivers logged into Uber.
165.
by letstryagain 13y ago
It's pretty obvious that the 'client' was indeed the NSA. They say they can't reveal who the client is because of the NDA. If the client was NOT the NSA they could simply say so. But they didn't...
166.
by letstryagain 13y ago
You can't buy doge here, it's just a wallet. Doge are for sale on a couple of exchanges, for example https://www.cryptsy.com/markets/view/132 https://coinedup.com/OrderBook?market=DOGE&am
167.
by letstryagain 13y ago
Luckily Bitcoin's success does not depend on the banks 'feeling comfortable' with it.
168.
by letstryagain 13y ago
This is more of a Visa / Mastercard competitor than a 'Bitcoin Killer' It's centralised, it's bank-controlled, it's USD denominated. Also this is just a patent, we don't even know that they're actuall
169.
by letstryagain 13y ago
I'm pretty sure the intrinsic value of gold is less than 10% of the market value. If the world suddenly stopped seeing gold as 'money' or a 'store of value' or whatever it would lose 90% or more of its value. Bitcoi
170.
by letstryagain 13y ago
If gold suddenly fell out of favour as a money it would lose more than 90% of its value. Bitcoin would lose 100%. Yes there's a difference but not much.
171.
by letstryagain 13y ago
Do you buy $1000 hamburgers?
172.
by letstryagain 13y ago
Solar panels / farm tractors / metal lathes do not print money directly like these devices do.
173.
by letstryagain 13y ago
If your servers have GPUs then it might be worth it, but otherwise you'll pay more in extra electricity than you'll get out in Bitcoin.
174.
by letstryagain 13y ago
It's too late unless you are AMD or Intel.
175.
by letstryagain 13y ago
I hope lots of people buy devices like this. The bigger the Tor network the better!
176.
by letstryagain 13y ago
Yes but Bitcoin uses 'below number X' which has more precision than just counting leading zeroes.
177.
by letstryagain 13y ago
You are correct but I think everyone understands that they mean the RIAA / MPAA in this context.
178.
by letstryagain 13y ago
BIPS was a payments processor. Merchants used them to accept Bitcoin payments AFK.
179.
by letstryagain 13y ago
Not exactly the same thing. Consider this example: Threshold is 001010 The numbers 001001 and 001011 have the same number of leading zeroes but one is below the threshold and the other is not.