18 ms·
It's pretty obvious that the 'client' was indeed the NSA. They say they can't reveal who the client is because of the NDA. If the client was NOT the NSA they co
by letstryagain 13y ago
It's pretty obvious that the 'client' was indeed the NSA. They say they can't reveal who the client is because of the NDA. If the client was NOT the NSA they could simply say so. But they didn't...
- maxerickson 13y agoI don't think you can play 20 questions and also say that you are respecting the NDA.
- TheCondor 13y agoFips certifications cost some money and openssl relies upon sponsors to do that. As I understood their explanation it was one of the fips sponsors. It had a bug anyways, nobody ever used dual ec with openssl.
- grmarcil 13y agoThat's not how NDAs work... usually would be a prohibition of both confirming AND/or denying anything related to the information behind the NDA.
- crag 13y agoAhhh no. Your making assumptions. It's not obvious that the client was the NSA. Why not the DOD, or CIA, or hell even SSA? Not that it matters much anyway. The result is the same.