Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
letmevoteplease
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
1.
▲
by
letmevoteplease
17d ago
Cool but please rewrite the text. Ctrl + F "land" gives 29 matches.
2.
▲
by
letmevoteplease
19d ago
This study appears to be evidence against that: the model failed the benchmark but arrived at the correct answer.
3.
▲
by
letmevoteplease
25d ago
> Altman was caught in previous attempts trying to game benchmarks Sounds like something you just made up, or maybe you read it on some other Reddit/HN post and started repeating it because it aligned with your biases. > does any
4.
▲
by
letmevoteplease
25d ago
I also like DeepSeek, but I'll note their stated goal is to develop AGI, and the founder (already China’s fifth-richest person) has stated, "I believe the business opportunities here are large enough-if the AI era will produce man
5.
▲
by
letmevoteplease
25d ago
You quoted the OP saying "in this case too they didn't actually have the solution" and responded with the totally unrelated, "Given the size and recall of the biggest models, it's not unreasonable to assume that a s
6.
▲
by
letmevoteplease
27d ago
You are confusing ideas here. No one except OpenAI had a solution to Navier–Stokes. Buckmaster and Alpöge had a solution for the forced Euler problem, which they arrived at largely using LLMs (Claude and Codex). Buckmaster implies (but does
7.
▲
by
letmevoteplease
27d ago
This is how every conspiracy theorist thinks: my enemy is Bad, and if they did a Bad thing, it would be Good for them, therefore they obviously did it. No evidence needed other than "motive" + my enemy is evil. But even if your en
8.
▲
by
letmevoteplease
29d ago
It reads like it was generated with AI and then edited to have poorer grammar. "A launch is a first impression and first impressions are marketing, that’s why you’re always bound to be shocked - the shock was scheduled." "And
9.
▲
by
letmevoteplease
1mo ago
If they stated the storage limits explicitly, people would just go right up to the edge. Better to leave it undefined and assess compliance afterward.
10.
▲
by
letmevoteplease
1mo ago
I think most of the people who act like this are secretly using ChatGPT like a Republican on Grindr.
11.
▲
by
letmevoteplease
1mo ago
“Read, read, read. Read everything -- trash, classics, good and bad, and see how they do it. Just like a carpenter who works as an apprentice and studies the master. Read! You'll absorb it. Then write. If it's good, you'll fi
12.
▲
by
letmevoteplease
2mo ago
Even if 99% of generations are trash, why does that matter? Just throw out the failures and keep the good ones, like any writer. Here is the text of the winning story: https://granta.com/the-serpent-in-the-grove/ If yo
13.
▲
by
letmevoteplease
2mo ago
It is of course a stupid regulation, but the upside is that it will probably accelerate growth in usage of open models that are not adversarial towards the user.
14.
▲
by
letmevoteplease
2mo ago
Look at this statement from the article: >These racks are needed to keep up with the ballooning requirements of each new "frontier" (a buzzword label with no actual inclination of performance of improvement) model developed, wh
15.
▲
by
letmevoteplease
2mo ago
Yup. OpenAI: "the name of the fictional target for the CTF challenge unintentionally coincided with a real domain." Anthropic: "the fictional target company chosen by our evaluation partner shared a name with an active websit
16.
▲
by
letmevoteplease
2mo ago
This does not make sense. Did you read the article? They were not trying to "catch" it accessing the internet. It did not escape. A partner accidentally left the connection to the internet open.
17.
▲
by
letmevoteplease
2mo ago
Have you considered that there are reasons to do things beyond financial incentives? This incident is obviously very interesting, particular to the type of hacker employed by Hugging Face.
18.
▲
by
letmevoteplease
2mo ago
Go ahead and be specific about this lie.
19.
▲
by
letmevoteplease
2mo ago
Totally evidence-free speculation presented as fact. The average Hacker News thread about AI feels like reading /r/conspiracy.
20.
▲
by
letmevoteplease
3mo ago
Looks like another project that's gonna purity spiral into People's Front of Judea vs. the Judean People's Front weirdos sniping at each other.
21.
▲
by
letmevoteplease
3mo ago
This is not client side. Images just sitting on your Android phone are probably safe (although Google could push an update at any time). Your images get scanned when you back them up, send them over RCS, etc. I have even seen criminal cases
22.
▲
by
letmevoteplease
3mo ago
A mistake from a public relations perspective, but I think taking an explicit stance against deplatforming and self-censorship is consistent with Mullvad's stated mission.
23.
▲
by
letmevoteplease
3mo ago
"the future where robots do everything" and "unemployment" are the same thing
24.
▲
Texas wins court order to suspend domain name for violating age-verification law
(texasattorneygeneral.gov)
200 points
by
letmevoteplease
3mo ago
|
308 comments
25.
▲
by
letmevoteplease
3mo ago
The story of the hand-dug well: https://www.mybrightonandhove.org.uk/places/utilities/woodin...
26.
▲
by
letmevoteplease
3mo ago
I think you're confusing this with the more classic "it's not X, but Y" trope. That sentence is a comma splice that I'd expect LLMs to avoid by default.
27.
▲
by
letmevoteplease
4mo ago
Not sure how to square this post with recent headlines like "SoftBank posts $46 billion gain at Vision Fund driven mainly by massive OpenAI bet".
28.
▲
by
letmevoteplease
4mo ago
Figure 03 is 134 pounds. 1x NEO (the only one really designed for household usage) is 66 pounds. Unitree R1 is 55 pounds. None of these are ready for real work yet but probably at some point in the future we will have practical humanoids.
29.
▲
by
letmevoteplease
4mo ago
In a competitive market, this won't happen: "passing along more of the value to major shareholders like myself." The price of human labor will go down, but competition will force the price of goods to go down alongside it. Pr
30.
▲
by
letmevoteplease
4mo ago
Where are you getting "after they corrected for multiple testing the significance of 2 of those disappeared"? The text you quoted says, of the three, one disappeared and two remained.
More ›