lerouxb

13 ms·

1. 91.▲
   by lerouxb 14y ago

   You're right. I should have explicitly specified "aimed at dynamic languages". Compiling dynamic languages to CLR or JVM sortof works, but is less than ideal. And "ideal" (or more suitable, at least) language-neutral bytecode projects have
2. 92.▲
   by lerouxb 14y ago

   Bytecode on the web is a shitty idea. The minifiers and obfuscators out there are already breaking "view source" and with that the spirit of the web. Besides: I can't think of language-neutral bytecode projects that ever worked. Remember Pa
3. 93.▲
   by lerouxb 14y ago

   How much time could you possibly spend with each of your devices?
4. 94.▲
   by lerouxb 14y ago

   I think they should have copied Apple there too: Remember the OS9 emulation that OSX used to have? Just emulate Windows 7 so you can use apps like microsoft office. Or make a proper Metro / tablet / touch oriented version of Office a priori
5. 95.▲
   by lerouxb 14y ago

   They could have so easily gotten around that by just calling it "Metro" and doing a clean break. Then just promise everyone that windows isn't going away and imply that there will/might still be a windows 8 which would be a continuation of
6. 96.▲
   by lerouxb 14y ago

   So what real thing does this kid have, then? Or what _degree_ is it?