4 ms·

You're right. I should have explicitly specified "aimed at dynamic languages". Compiling dynamic languages to CLR or JVM sortof works, but is less than ideal. A

by lerouxb 14y ago

You're right. I should have explicitly specified "aimed at dynamic languages". Compiling dynamic languages to CLR or JVM sortof works, but is less than ideal. And "ideal" (or more suitable, at least) language-neutral bytecode projects have never taken off.