leni536

40 ms·

601.
by leni536 4y ago
While it is cool and useful, it is unsound. https://mypy-play.net/?mypy=latest&python=3.10&flags=strict&... https://www.online-python.com/V5YRZJAWlk
602.
by leni536 4y ago
Honestly, for a brand new name service I would just stick to ASCII to sidestep the whole issue.
603.
by leni536 4y ago
I do prefer references, because they can't be null. It is less state to worry about. I agree that not having explicit out-parameters makes this a trade-off. It is possible to use an out-parameter wrapper type to get the best of both wo
604.
by leni536 4y ago
I would advice against using __COUNTER__ or macros based on that in header files. It's an ODR-violation footgun.
605.
by leni536 4y ago
Many standard containers don't have noexcept move operations in Microsoft's implementation. It is conforming. Having a throwing move doesn't mean that you can't have exception guarantees. Just do the throwing operations
606.
by leni536 4y ago
const-by-default is definitely nice. Does this extend to both sides of a pointer type? Does int * refer to int const * const? There is nothing wrong with [&] for short-lifetime lambdas. Lambdas passed to std algorithms or immediately in
607.
by leni536 4y ago
I don't get it, just use `list<person>`. The prev and next pointers live next to the person objects right in the same node, no need for intrusive pointer. edit: The author assesses that this is somehow bad for person objects that
608.
by leni536 4y ago
Funny you mention quicksort, as qsort in libc is not guaranteed to be implemented by quicksort. So that's an other poor naming.
609.
by leni536 4y ago
AFAIK it's newer android storage API limitations that they did't work around yet.
610.
by leni536 4y ago
> Basically measure testosterone levels of out door laborers and indoor laborers. This is very susceptible to various biases.
611.
by leni536 4y ago
As far as I remember, I signed up without a phone number, and got immediately locked out. I could get access back by providing my number. I wrote to support that I would rather not use Twitter than giving my number. They unlocked my account
612.
by leni536 4y ago
> Imagine if an airline overbooked/cancelled on you and just said fuck off, find a new flight, here's your credit. You don't have to imagine. This happens quite regularly with Wizzair nowadays.
613.
by leni536 4y ago
Sorry, it was meant as an example for that, not as a counterpoint. I did solve the field without guessing, so it wasn't a problem.
614.
by leni536 4y ago
Once I had a field where the last place to uncover was completely surrounded by mines, revealing the digit 8 underneath.
615.
by leni536 4y ago
I also prefer Linux, but Windows ships ssh nowadays. Even ssh server, but arguably that's way less useful than an ssh server on any other OS.
616.
by leni536 4y ago
Last I checked, you can't do that on more recent models, can you?
617.
by leni536 4y ago
Sometimes (definitely not always) you can use std::function instead for dynamic polymorphism.
618.
by leni536 4y ago
Looks like a good way to drift from the clock and eventually skip frames.
619.
by leni536 4y ago
Ah, I thought it was line-buffered, but apparently I was wrong.
620.
by leni536 4y ago
cerr should flush on \n too by default, AFAIK.
621.
by leni536 4y ago
> This is the only UB here. That's debateable. 1. new[] doesn't return a pointer that is suitable for storage for the objects. Yes the objects are empty (only contain padding), but that doesn't absolve from UB. 2. "&q
622.
by leni536 4y ago
Yes, dereferencing past the end is not fine, but the address itself is.
623.
by leni536 4y ago
Nit: one past end of an array is actually fine as an address.
624.
by leni536 4y ago
""[1] is not the termination byte, it's the byte after that. Its address is taken there with &, which yields a const char*. The (char *) cast is only there to cast away const.
625.
by leni536 4y ago
This program is undefined, so no, except maybe if you can make the compiler itself to crash.
626.
by leni536 4y ago
No, it's the address past the end of the array {'\0'}.
627.
by leni536 4y ago
I get how this works, but this has undefined behaviour at multiple places.
628.
by leni536 4y ago
Wasn't xmpp support dropped years ago?
629.
by leni536 4y ago
> Maybe what they need to do is scrap the existing disparate cancer screening databases and create a new centralised one. Like they did for covid. The hard part is probably migrating all the existing data. It'smuch easier if you can
630.
by leni536 4y ago
Add a new account, set protocol to "None (SMTP only)", set it up.

More ›