Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lemonlyman87
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
Should Face Recognition Be in Tech Transparency Reports?
(lawfareblog.com)
1 points
by
lemonlyman87
7y ago
|
0 comments
2.
▲
Supreme Court Cellphone Case Won't Stop Location Tracking
(slate.com)
2 points
by
lemonlyman87
9y ago
|
0 comments
3.
▲
GOP “Border” Bill Mandates Snooping into Social Media Accounts
(foreignpolicy.com)
3 points
by
lemonlyman87
9y ago
|
0 comments
4.
▲
DHS Plans Face Scanning Drones at Border
(justsecurity.org)
1 points
by
lemonlyman87
9y ago
|
0 comments
5.
▲
Taser’s Free Body Cameras Are Good for Cops, Not the People
(wired.com)
2 points
by
lemonlyman87
9y ago
|
0 comments
6.
▲
Three Perspectives on Baltimore Spy Planes
(medium.com)
1 points
by
lemonlyman87
10y ago
|
0 comments
7.
▲
Tinder Sues Threesome App
(theguardian.com)
2 points
by
lemonlyman87
10y ago
|
0 comments
8.
▲
First Look at Uber's Self Driving Car
(businessinsider.com)
1 points
by
lemonlyman87
10y ago
|
0 comments
9.
▲
Surveillance Chickens Come Home to Roost
(justsecurity.org)
1 points
by
lemonlyman87
11y ago
|
0 comments
10.
▲
Government Rewarding Bad Policies for Police Body Cameras
(justsecurity.org)
2 points
by
lemonlyman87
11y ago
|
0 comments
11.
▲
Senate Considers Bill to Legalize Fork Bombs, Helpful Worms, Ransomware
(cdt.org)
3 points
by
lemonlyman87
11y ago
|
0 comments
12.
▲
White House Offers Vague Suppport for Warrant for Emails
(techdirt.com)
1 points
by
lemonlyman87
11y ago
|
0 comments
13.
▲
FBI Plan for Encryption: Build Thor's Magic Hammer
(cdt.org)
4 points
by
lemonlyman87
11y ago
|
0 comments
14.
▲
Proposed Info Sharing Legislation Could Worsen NSA Surveillance
(cdt.org)
95 points
by
lemonlyman87
11y ago
|
23 comments
15.
▲
Senate Cyber Bill Makes Data More Vulnerable After OPM
(cdt.org)
3 points
by
lemonlyman87
11y ago
|
0 comments
16.
▲
Police Threaten to Use EMP?
(theblaze.com)
2 points
by
lemonlyman87
11y ago
|
0 comments
17.
▲
by
lemonlyman87
11y ago
@karmacondon, you argue that "If something is legal, ethical and moral then it doesn't matter if technology makes it easier to do or not," but I think sometimes - in situations such as this - technological advances can change
18.
▲
by
lemonlyman87
11y ago
I think the reasonableness issue comes into play in two ways: First, its an objective test, which means reasonableness is based on factors such as democratic accountability, personal autonomy, threats of government abuse, etc. Second, it&#x
19.
▲
by
lemonlyman87
11y ago
Yes, the concurrance is fantastic in general, and really hits the nail on the head of why location data needs 4th Amendment protections today: "[Location data] generates a precise, comprehensive record of a person’s public movements th
20.
▲
by
lemonlyman87
11y ago
Hi all, Original Author of the article here - glad to see so much interest and discussion of this topic. There are a few threads going on here but the main one seems to be: Should we care about "privacy" of information available i
21.
▲
How Should Police Body Cams Work After Ferguson
(cdt.org)
2 points
by
lemonlyman87
12y ago
|
0 comments
22.
▲
The Best Tools for Safe Encrypted Communications
(projects.propublica.org)
3 points
by
lemonlyman87
12y ago
|
0 comments
23.
▲
Intelligence Community Supports Ending NSA Bulk Collection
(cdt.org)
1 points
by
lemonlyman87
12y ago
|
0 comments
24.
▲
by
lemonlyman87
12y ago
Yes, that provision does state that any type of wire cut conducted pursuant to 7907 that cuts cell service is also labeled as denial of cell service as discussed in 7908, but denial of cell service is not limited to such situations - there
25.
▲
by
lemonlyman87
12y ago
I think the main reason they're passing the bill in general is a genuine desire to deter smartphone theft, and the result is a very bad policy outcome. But keep in mind absent this law there is no mandatory kill switch in phones in the
26.
▲
by
lemonlyman87
12y ago
The blog post gives a full discussion of the extent to which the kill switch can be co-opted by law enforcement, and I think does so in a fair manner. It directly references both the bill's requirements for police use and PUC 7908. You
27.
▲
by
lemonlyman87
12y ago
Because prior judicial approval is the key check to preventing government abuse; if police want to shut down a protest a judge potentially telling them they went too far 6 hours later is not going to help.
28.
▲
by
lemonlyman87
12y ago
As a critic of the bill, I'll readily concede that smartphone theft is a major problem. It's one of the most prominant crimes in urban areas, costs billions of dollars a year, and has in several occassions caused violence. Still,
29.
▲
by
lemonlyman87
12y ago
Also from the actual bill (which the post includes a link to in the first line): "Any request by a government agency to interrupt communications service utilizing a technological solution required by this section is subject to Section
30.
▲
by
lemonlyman87
12y ago
Hi all; original author of this blog post, happy to see it getting so much feedback. I think it's important to highlight the risks in and out of state: The bill says that police CAN use this mandatory kill switch, but must comply with
More ›