Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
leertaylor
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
leertaylor
15y ago
I saw a live demo of this stuff at a trade show two weeks ago, and it was truly amazing. It put any other coating I've ever seen to shame (such as RainX). While they had a shirt and a shoe on display, the demo was mainly focused around com
2.
▲
by
leertaylor
17y ago
> There's a reason most companies don't talk pay with people - if somebody else makes more, it's going to bruise feelings and ruffle feathers and screw up morale. I don't think thats quite right... The reason most companies don't talk p
3.
▲
by
leertaylor
17y ago
We use FogBugz with about 60 users. Its been interesting seeing its growth over the years. The recent Fogbugz 7 release seems to be one of the most significant though with the addition of plugin support enabling a lot more customization.
4.
▲
by
leertaylor
17y ago
The $99 fee is basically the same as what it costs to become a developer for the iPhone. The $50 fee for being listed in the official App Catalog is different, and feels like a good alternative to me since they also have the free distribut
5.
▲
by
leertaylor
17y ago
I'm already in Boston, but taking the day off from work on Monday.
6.
▲
by
leertaylor
17y ago
I'm also about 90% sure that I'll be there!
7.
▲
by
leertaylor
17y ago
I enjoy various sorts of hands-on projects when I need a break for the tech world: Woodworking - building furniture, etc. Fixing up old pinball machines Working on the house, minor remodeling sorts of projects
8.
▲
by
leertaylor
17y ago
While Palm is definitely skating on some thin ice with their approach, I can't blame them for wanting to use iTunes as their synchronization engine... Probably the majority of the market they are going after already uses iTunes. Why force
9.
▲
by
leertaylor
17y ago
I'm a bit new to HN, but I'd be game for a meetup Sunday night or Monday after the event.
10.
▲
by
leertaylor
17y ago
I find it interesting that the majority of the comments on this post seem to focus on "how this article got the rule wrong." Sure, it may be true that the way the author interprets a version of the 80/20 rule may not be the same as as ever