leemuro

4 ms·

1.
by leemuro 7y ago
It seems like the algorithm is just biased towards actual income of a given person, and doesn't take marriage into account. If that is the case, is the program just sexist by proxy, and income inequality is the real issue here?
2.
by leemuro 8y ago
I switched from a Macbook Pro to a Surface Book a few years back. It was, and probably will remain, the worst technical decision I've made. The hardware, drivers, and dock were had death by 1000 cut type glitches. Additionally, I (a
3.
by leemuro 8y ago
Sorry if this seems like a dumb question, but are there any particular banks/accounts you use for this method? I would want it to be very easy to open accounts online with no hassle if I were to use this approach.
4.
by leemuro 11y ago
Agree, but if someone is putting all their effort and focus onto it they are missing the point. If you go out of your way to eat all "organic" and "natural" foods but you're 50 lbs overweight you need to get your p
5.
by leemuro 11y ago
"Chemicals" are a scapegoat. Everything you put in your face is a "chemical". Folks just need to eat food that isn't just a bunch of empty dense calories. Stuff that actually satisfies you.
6.
by leemuro 11y ago
This is such a bad study and this post is your usual garbage of the media just confusing people and making them think weight loss is impossible, all while giving them more excuses to do absolutely nothing. The idea that this "data&quot
7.
by leemuro 12y ago
Skipping or eating light for breakfast has worked miracles for me. While agreed that it is definitely not a license to eat however much you want, there are some convincing arguments that eating in this pattern (particularly delaying carboh
8.
by leemuro 13y ago
Apparently whoever made this at MS did so on their phone during happy hour because its some of the worst marketing I've ever seen.
9.
Value.js: Strict, immutable value objects in JavaScript(github.com)
2 points by leemuro 14y ago|0 comments