leberwurstsaft

7 ms·

1.
by leberwurstsaft 13y ago
Only up to 8 nodes per session (at least, at the moment), according to the docs and this post: http://lightyearsoftware.com/2014/03/multipeer-connectivity-...
2.
by leberwurstsaft 13y ago
There's this iOS app that generates very similar images, but with some interactivity. https://itunes.apple.com/app/rgb-petri/id423126001?mt=8
3.
by leberwurstsaft 13y ago
Sweet, I attended a talk about this this spring in our university. The one big question was about the enormous energy density in these cubes. It must some way or another get into them, which seemed quite impossible to do. But, I for one hop
4.
by leberwurstsaft 13y ago
There is also XRay Editor ( http://mireus.com/xrayeditor/ ) that comes with an Xcode plugin to relatively easily convert the changes you made into code. It also has an overlay feature to be able to adapt to a mockup. The
5.
by leberwurstsaft 14y ago
you missed to multiply by 2h. 86400 frames equal only 1h.
6.
by leberwurstsaft 14y ago
It's case sensitive and has related problems in finding words. Entering all lowercase letters recommended. While I'm sure it was a fun exercise to build it and there will most likely even be "helper apps" appearing on the App Store soon, I
7.
by leberwurstsaft 14y ago
For some reason this app seems to miss a lot of its advertised functionality in Germany, or maybe just on my phone. The image search results aren't displayed in a scrolling slideshow at all, instead each result links to the desktop version
8.
by leberwurstsaft 14y ago
On an iOS device with retina display it's awfully blurry, probably just not rendering to a big enough canvas.
9.
by leberwurstsaft 14y ago
While stitching together the original images to a higher resolution panorama ( https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B2Y0xU4gYdrLd1BFNXJiT1JacUE - 50MB, 31K pixels wide, do not open the image in the browser, but download it, you've been warned.
10.
by leberwurstsaft 14y ago
You're right, so I went ahead and recreated the panorama with the source images. Output file is much clearer at 31,792 x 5,683 (~50MB). You can find it here: https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B2Y0xU4gYdrLd1BFNXJiT1JacUE (Use File -->
11.
by leberwurstsaft 14y ago
Also: http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/raw/ doesn't load thumbnails but the full sized images… (is this 1994?)
12.
by leberwurstsaft 14y ago
Not to belittle the achievement, but what's up with the HUGE white stripes above and below the panoramic image? Makes browsing the image a bigger hassle than necessary and adds quite some MB in size. 11.5 MB for the full resolution image vs
13.
by leberwurstsaft 14y ago
Thank you! The lower part isn't really a good fit, but the upper part is nice to look at.
14.
by leberwurstsaft 14y ago
Thanks, and yes, it does roll off one's tongue :)
15.
by leberwurstsaft 14y ago
The algorithm is actually a lot quicker to act. Once an hour would be quite useless in many cases (especially power loss).
16.
by leberwurstsaft 14y ago
I also have made great use of this great menu of cocoa controls. Thanks for creating it and keeping it up! I do occasionally wonder about the name "controls" for this kind of components. But it seems to be how most people refer to them.
17.
by leberwurstsaft 14y ago
I'm quite amazed that this is even possible to do, as it needs recent satellite imagery both from after they allegedly hiked there and from shortly before, to be able to make comparisons. Is there some place where one can check the recency
18.
by leberwurstsaft 14y ago
I'd say it may even be contributing to accessibility, precisely because of the use of CSS to achieve a desired look instead of falling back to imagery. This allows to disable styles or rather allows screenreaders to still work their way thr
19.
by leberwurstsaft 14y ago
Tablets are not rated by EPEAT.
20.
by leberwurstsaft 14y ago
Bigger yet, http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpeg/PIA15689.jpg (23096x7981 at 13.7 MB)
21.
by leberwurstsaft 14y ago
Ugh, the need to delete the corrupt version and then install the good version also gets rid of all user data. What a mess. Of course, this could be fixed by slightly increasing the version number or some other way to let iOS know that the g
22.
by leberwurstsaft 14y ago
Ugh, sounds like the wrong way to do things. Shouldn't they rather work on preventing the bloat and creeping in of toolbars and unwanted stuff? I shouldn't have to reset a profile just like I shouldn't have to reinstall an OS just to make i
23.
by leberwurstsaft 14y ago
This magazine, while made with good intentions, really hurts my eyes. The colors clash, and on many pages its even hard to read the text at all. It's like 1995 web design. Here's hoping for a better issue #2.
24.
by leberwurstsaft 15y ago
I just tested this at home with a few different light sources, and yes, it does lock all three - focus, aperture, white balance. But all in the one spot you tap-held. Afaik, all the apps that have a two-spot way of selecting focus and apert
25.
by leberwurstsaft 15y ago
I'd like to add that it's possible to lock focus and exposure (not sure if also white balance) by tapping and holding on any spot in the "viewfinder". Also, see the full frame in the internal camera.app, just double tap the screen and it wi