learneconomics

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by learneconomics 18y ago

   Why is it shameful? It's not a "wacky correlation" - it's arguing that there is causation. It's basically saying "we have data proving the Laffer curve exists." That's not wacky. That's giving credence to a theory. Low, flat-taxes are h
2. 2.▲
   by learneconomics 18y ago

   1. They are doing it with logic. 2. Do you consider the New York Times, or Washington Post, or any other major daily to be the newspaper of the poor? Give me a break.
3. 3.▲
   by learneconomics 18y ago

   It's incredible to see your post get so much karma given that your argument is so wrong. You really should learn some statistics yourself - total revenue for the government happens to be a function of tax rates. Using examples such as "sof