lbotos

28 ms·

361.
by lbotos 4y ago
The biggest plus for Mint is they now support legit TOTP for account access.
362.
by lbotos 4y ago
> But where exactly is line before that? Unfortunately the line of "fair use" is very blurry and only gets clarified in specific instances, with lawyers and humans debating if there was damage done. It's extremely frustrat
363.
by lbotos 4y ago
> your algorithmic distribution of the original works (the model) is a clear copyright violation Depends on if it's considered "transformative" enough. If Google can cache thumbnails for search, how is an AI model not a &q
364.
by lbotos 4y ago
> many artists are worried about their livelihood while a multi-billion dollar company is working towards making them obsolete often using their own work. You do realize that most commercial art is "art for hire" and in this ve
365.
by lbotos 4y ago
Consider this statement my own, but look at my profile for bias. I think you might be misunderstanding. Look at the companies there now: https://github.com/flowforge/flowforge - The CTO is the creator. https:/&#x
366.
by lbotos 4y ago
Exactly, all man pages and google is fair. We want to see how they think not rote memorization .
367.
by lbotos 4y ago
Why are you afraid of this? My org has run a hands-on technical exam with a stack of linux admin basics (I won't enumerate them here because people do their research) but they are based on real problems we've had and the feedbac
368.
by lbotos 4y ago
I always remember it as alphabetical order, brackets then parens, b then p.
369.
by lbotos 4y ago
In the eyes of copyright law, the human element, as only humans can hold copyright. (for now)
370.
by lbotos 4y ago
You are misreading it and it's easy to do so. This is the money quote: "Thaler does not assert that the Work was created with contribution from a human author" All it takes is for the copyright submission for this Artist to s
371.
by lbotos 4y ago
" The finding that AI cannot be an author for copyright purposes does not mean that AI-assisted outputs are void of any copyright protection. Works created by a human using software on a computer (e.g., Microsoft Word or Adobe Photosho
372.
by lbotos 4y ago
> As far as I know, AI art can't be copyrighted. Why do you think that? There is a common article that gets passed around where a person tried to get copyright assigned to a machine and that keeps getting denied. That is very dif
373.
by lbotos 4y ago
I only boot windows to play Counter-strike. I just got a new video card and wanted to get into task manager but I forgot what it was called. I searched "activity monitor" in the little search box, and the top most result was defin
374.
by lbotos 4y ago
My email is in my profile if you have an open ticket number for this issue that I can take a look at when I'm at my desk Monday.
375.
by lbotos 4y ago
See my reply below: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33289468 If you were able to style the element with "classic" CSS primitives like border/background/color would that not have also solved the pr
376.
by lbotos 4y ago
Right, my point is, we've now introduced this new attribute for "browser elements" instead of saying now checkboxes support background-color, color, etc. And let the designer do the work. Lean on the primitives we already hav
377.
by lbotos 4y ago
It's an interesting question. I'd personally love to see more effort being given to "defend your point as succinctly as possible." I wrote a lot of "minimum word count essays and in the "real world" clarit
378.
by lbotos 4y ago
Does anyone else feel like CSS has jumped the shark a bit? https://web.dev/state-of-css-2022/#accent-color Sure it's a "nice to have" but it bloats the spec? Look at the current actual implementation: h
379.
by lbotos 4y ago
There are local WebUIs. Someone named AUTOMATIC1111 has a popular one. They added in a "leaked" model. Stability.ai, banned AUTO from their discord and accused him of "stealing/promoting piracy". Community enflamed.
380.
by lbotos 4y ago
This is my favorite part of this whole "debate". I think the layperson does not realize how "risky" it is to be an "artist" because of copyright. The entire art tradition is based on copying for study, and then
381.
by lbotos 4y ago
possibly but you'd need to do a couple of transformations first. https://youtu.be/0_BBRNYInx8?t=85 This video (released yesterday) talks about how SD takes an image, converts it to latents. You'd need to decode
382.
by lbotos 4y ago
Yep, they explicitly say it here: https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/y9ga5s/com...
383.
by lbotos 4y ago
My understanding is it was trained on this dataset: https://rom1504.github.io/clip-retrieval/?back=https%3A%2F%2... Which has a LOT of NSFW images in it. I suspect if you removed them from the training set it would go
384.
by lbotos 4y ago
You are correct that the "model" may be a separate piece of work with it's own copyright but that does not mean that the model does not produce copyrighted works.
385.
Lesson 9: Deep Learning Foundations to Stable Diffusion, 2022(youtube.com)
2 points by lbotos 4y ago|0 comments
386.
by lbotos 4y ago
I did try on my iPhone and it didn't appear to work :(
387.
by lbotos 4y ago
If you want to be my hero, can you try to install this extension on Orion on iPad https://github.com/WaldiPL/playbackSpeed https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/playback-spee...
388.
by lbotos 4y ago
If I get a 1TB iPad Pro (16GB of ram) with pencil and keyboard it's $2200. Without the pencil it's $2148. If I get a 1TB 13 Inch M2 Macbook (16GB ram) it's 1899. I have been avoiding getting an iPad because it can't run
389.
by lbotos 4y ago
Anyone have iPad Pro screen protector recommendations? Looking to get one of these and worried about screens getting "softer glass" and would rather have a sacrificial layer on top.
390.
by lbotos 4y ago
I don't particularly, but I like to watch videos at 3 and 4x and bigger procs have helped. Older iPads stumbled past 2x. But, It does make me salty that an M2 iPad can't run Xcode. I wish they would figure that out as it would gre

More ›