4 ms·
> But where exactly is line before that? Unfortunately the line of "fair use" is very blurry and only gets clarified in specific instances, with lawyers and hu
by lbotos 4y ago
> But where exactly is line before that?
Unfortunately the line of "fair use" is very blurry and only gets clarified in specific instances, with lawyers and humans debating if there was damage done.
It's extremely frustrating and these advances are going to pressure fair use for sure.
People will generate infringing work with AI and people will generate newly copyrightable work with AI. The danger is, as an artist, it's hard to trust if the model has given you something that is copyrighted as you have not necessarily seen it before. (You the human can cite your references, and it's possible you were subliminally influenced, but with SD, generic prompts may give you "copyrighted details" that you don't know.)
- Imnimo 4y agoYeah, definitely. It's more starkly clear with Copilot, where you can point to verbatim reproduction of code. And it probably helps Stable Diffusion that images are fuzzier, so you're less likely to generate something that's close enough to be a copyright violation, but there's really no way to be certain that your output is not a memorized training example, even if it's statistically very unlikely.