Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lazyeye
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
91.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
Other ways you can lose your democracy.... Using lawfare to try to take out a political opponent (ridiculous NY charge with no precedent, no victim, and from a DA who was famous for reducing felonies to misdemeanours but for Trump did the o
92.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
Yep...cleaning up the mess left behind by dysfunctional Democrat politics....
93.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
I was using the term "one-party state" metaphorically. I thought that would be obvious. In any case the demographics in California are now such that it is close to impossible for a Republican governor to be elected. Which means th
94.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
California politics are what you get in any one-party state which California is as a result of immigration/demographic change. Politicians rise to the top not on the basis of accountability and the contest of ideas, but due to politica
95.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
Well this rather small level of nuanced thinking you are suggesting is never applied to conservatives is it? So we'll take the same approach with liberals. What you are saying is effectively dog-whistling in support of Stalinism. And
96.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
"I probably shouldn't extrapolate this historical anecdote to the modern era..." yes cherry-picked history taken in isolation is utterly meaningless. Just for balance here's some cherries I've picked on the left sid
97.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
Well I guess he is "described" as a socialist in the same way the sky is "described" as blue. Your question is easy to answer...look at all of human history and around the world right now to see what you get when the far
98.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
Agreed. They were also happy to give up a US citizens to the CCP in the hope of gaining marketshare in China. There was a senior whistleblower in Facebook that revealed this a little while ago. https://www.youtube.com/watch?
99.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
They "trust me"...Dumb f*ks
100.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
Either that or they understand exactly what it means, the actual reality of it as compared to the "sounds nice in theory..."
101.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
I'm wondering whether this is targeted and islamic beliefs are playing a role in this.
102.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
Your comment is just meaningless words disconnected from reality. And a very large number of people agree with me on some level. We saw the evidence of that at the last election. So my "bubble" is pretty large actually. What abou
103.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
The point I was making is that:- Using lawfare to try to take out a political opponent (ridiculous NY charge with no precedent, no victim, and from a DA who was famous for reducing felonies to misdemeanours but for Trump did the opposite) A
104.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
What's actually "nice"? Is it creating an industry and livelihoods for millions of people (directly or indirectly)? Or is it smiling and making people in the room feel comfortable?
105.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
No I mean what if YOU are the fascist?
106.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
What if your the fascist?
107.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
What if the restaurant gets a customer who is perfectly polite, tips well but is wearing a red maga hat?
108.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
It would interesting to know how it performs relative to other index funds even with the delay risk. A few people have been saying Nancy is getting better returns than Warren Buffet https://x.com/HawleyMO/status/19
109.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
I dunno...I dont think Ive seen a bunch of more clueless people than in the HN comment section. Of course there are lots of equally clueless people elsewhere but what makes HN dangerous is the people really think they know.
110.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
We need to get the people commenting on Hacker News running the negotations. Just imagine what could be achieved then......
111.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
If you watched the video you would know that the anecdotal evidence was precisely the opposite.
112.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
Holy shit you have not faintest clue what you are talking about.
113.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
Yes and quite possibly alot of this was due to US pressure. The EU has been quite happy to freeload till very recently. It's possible that Russia would not have invaded Ukraine at all if the EU hadnt been so weak militarily and so stup
114.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
This was actually a significant problem during the Biden administration. The rules were so vague that de-banking could be used in whatever context the administration found convenient. Apparently many companies were pushed offshore as a resu
115.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
And your point is?
116.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
Sigh....
117.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
This is not complicated. Food safety,work safety is not overreach. Dictating to businesses where they should locate their employees absolutely is overreach.
118.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
I guess I could but why would I bother?
119.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
I'm not sure what to make of your argument. Because the govt does manage some aspects of business, this therefore means they are entitled to manage all aspects of business? The govt could also then dictate what the workers eat, what
120.
▲
by
lazyeye
1y ago
Comparatively speaking, obviously yes.
More ›