lazyeye

18 ms·

1. 361.▲
   by lazyeye 2y ago

   I set up a smart bulb to act as a "color clock" in the evening. Every day at 8pm it's orange, 9pm red, 10pm off (sleep time). The brightness is very low (dim glow) and all other lights are off. 8pm onwards is cool down time.
2. 362.▲
   by lazyeye 2y ago

   So far we've mentioned 3 parties in this scenario...the NY Times, Cato Institute and the voting public. There used to be a time where we'd give priority to the "experts" despite how consistently wrong they seem to be ab
3. 363.▲
   by lazyeye 2y ago

   Yes exactly. I should have been more clearer. Read that as "when your accustomed to left-wing bias, a balanced media feels like right-wing bias".
4. 364.▲
   by lazyeye 2y ago

   I wonder what the cost of running this website is?
5. 365.▲
   by lazyeye 2y ago

   Is this just a training issue? They just need to train a model specifically for OCR?
6. 366.▲
   by lazyeye 2y ago

   "By now it's pretty clear that the network is actively driving discourse in one specific direction..." I don't think this is clear at all.
7. 367.▲
   by lazyeye 2y ago

   Clearly the American people did see a problem with inflation and voted accordingly. And no matter how they try to spin it to support a particular political narrative, that won't change. There are so many ways to spin the numbers to ma
8. 368.▲
   by lazyeye 2y ago

   Here's another mea culpa from Paul Krugman (he was wrong about globalization). What Economists (Including Me) Got Wrong About Globalization https://archive.md/DrJKm If you stick up a liquor and kill a couple of people
9. 369.▲
   by lazyeye 2y ago

   Sorry but quoting the NYTimes as evidence would be no different from a Republican quoting Fox News as evidence to you. Here's an old quote from the author, the esteemable Paul Krugman “The growth of the Internet will slow drastically,
10. 370.▲
    by lazyeye 2y ago

    I read a book on the history of the NYT. They would market themselves to advertisers with "our readers have the highest disposable income of aby news source in America". It's an interesting reflection on the modern Democrat p
11. 371.▲
    by lazyeye 2y ago

    This statement is ridiculously out of touch.
12. 372.▲
    by lazyeye 2y ago

    Statistics often exist to bamboozle and provide false and misleading context to otherwise extremely unpopular policy. In this case, for example, to justify actions (or lack thereof) that will sway voter demographics in your favor over the m
13. 373.▲
    by lazyeye 2y ago

    I guess people need to ignore their lying eyes.....
14. 374.▲
    by lazyeye 2y ago

    "I was extremely surprised to find out that based on ICE’s annual reports, which are still up, Biden’s administration deported far more people than Trump’s did..." I think this is an essentially meaningless number until you also i
15. 375.▲
    by lazyeye 2y ago

    I would argue you are sowing disinfo and I honestly dont know what point you are trying to make. Spikes and/or significant reductions in activity as indicated by external data sources, and particular the timing thereof, will obviously
16. 376.▲
    by lazyeye 2y ago

    I believe a large number of the people working at the big AI companies are foreign nationals and Im going to assume at least some of them have mixed loyalties.
17. 377.▲
    by lazyeye 2y ago

    Britain setup a holiday/prison camp for high-ranking german officers and bugged everything. It's a fascinating story.. https://www.amazon.com.au/Walls-Have-Ears-Intelligence-Opera...
18. 378.▲
    by lazyeye 2y ago

    I believe these agencies may have other kinds of intelligence data such as satellite photos of the (empty?) Wuhan Institute of Virology carpark, spikes in mobile phone activity in the area etc. So assessments are made on more than just bio
19. 379.▲
    by lazyeye 2y ago

    Given how critical data-centers are now in the AI race, cant help wondering if this is a front for some kind of intelligence operation....
20. 380.▲
    by lazyeye 2y ago

    I dont think this is true at all.
21. 381.▲
    by lazyeye 2y ago

    Off to /r/fatfire for you
22. 382.▲
    by lazyeye 2y ago

    I wonder if these "confused" people were the same people that thought they were best-positioned to tell everybody else how to think and behave?
23. 383.▲
    by lazyeye 2y ago

    I haven't heard of potassium before.
24. 384.▲
    by lazyeye 2y ago

    (shrug)...a meaningless reply
25. 385.▲
    by lazyeye 2y ago

    Yes I saw that too. Andreessen and Horowitz both believed that the last 4 years under Biden has been the worst environment for startups of their working life. The Dems basically wanted to anoint a small number of companies at the frontier o
26. 386.▲
    by lazyeye 2y ago

    Why wouldn't you believe it?
27. 387.▲
    by lazyeye 2y ago

    Not too mention Bill Maher who is also firmly on the left.
28. 388.▲
    by lazyeye 2y ago

    "Many political groups do this: they identify some aspect of the opposition, preferably one that is easy to ridicule, and then repeat those accusations ad-nauseum." Yes this is very common on the left too. Really common actually.
29. 389.▲
    by lazyeye 2y ago

    This is a worry!
30. 390.▲
    by lazyeye 2y ago

    I dont think this is remotely true. On any given subject there is an overwhelming horde of people desperate to disagree. And anyway, even if true, how would this be different from the previous arrangement where "official" lies wer