laughingcurve

5 ms·

31.
by laughingcurve 9mo ago
Possibly the greatest contribution to Claude code in months. I am rushing to my terminal to install, test, and update.
32.
by laughingcurve 9mo ago
Don’t be too harsh, it’s the most effort Gary has put into his criticism in a while </s> I appreciate good critique but this is not it
33.
by laughingcurve 9mo ago
i saw how it nerdsniped an extremely capable faculty member
34.
by laughingcurve 9mo ago
cool beans, thanks for this -- I think it's easier to hear it directly from the authors. I was hesitant to start researchposting and come off like a dick. also; note to self: If I publish and disown my papers, shawn will interview me :
35.
by laughingcurve 9mo ago
Article from 2018/19 and this hypothesis remains just that afaik with plenty of evidence going against it
36.
by laughingcurve 10mo ago
The article makes no compelling points to me as an avid user of these applications. I would rather shove ice picks covered in lemon juice than provide Java or Ellison anymore room in the digital ecosystem. And I’m not talking politics here
37.
by laughingcurve 10mo ago
Unironically, they are indeed somewhat safer -- however if people are willing to accept a substitute good of AI-based fortune telling... which I have seen lately ...
38.
by laughingcurve 10mo ago
Wow, I have not thought about OiNK in ages... great memories! OiNK and WhatCD did something very special for the musical community
39.
by laughingcurve 10mo ago
Incentives don’t remove agency. They might have incentives… but these are awful scum who deserve nothing but contempt
40.
by laughingcurve 11mo ago
I appreciate you doing this and sharing it. I had a similar experience with rust and tokenization library (BERTScore) and realized it was better to let the barely worse method stand because the effort was not worth it to maintain long term
41.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
I am a researcher in this field and and would love to talk more about loyal agents
42.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
I love typst and I tried to use it recently when shipping publications to EMNLP, AAAI, and NeurIPS. While there were a lot of upsides to it, things got very bad when the teams grew beyond just a few people. Typst is incredible for single-pe
43.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
Everything old is new again when you are in academia
44.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
[flagged]
45.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
How does calling a country full of people who are sad and desperate for a better life discriminate against them? This is the same kind of rhetoric I would hear someone use as an appeal to helping them. Hearing about these things makes me mo
46.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
It’s wild watching the supposedly most tech savvy place on the internet devolve into gnashing of teeth and wailing over development and progress. Hacker News? More like Grognard Complaints
47.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
Hail corporate
48.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
It’s the base because it’s the most important; not the least “erudite”.
49.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
As an American researcher, I can assure you that the Chinese superiority and behavior in the field is certainly ENCOURAGING my contributions.
50.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
Good luck trying to raise money from a NATIONAL science foundation without it being in the NATIONAL interest.
51.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
Same. For all the praise ad upvoting, I can’t get it working (yet)
52.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
Usually when crazy people get on the metro and start yelling their political opinions at no one, we all know it’s best to ignore them.
53.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
It crashed the market because retail investors and perhaps non-retail as well had a great deal in overconfidence with the ability of the USA to maintain a lead thanks to the chip gap. High Flyer's innovations allowed them to scale and
54.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
Yes, exactly. How the heck? It makes no sense to me either, but you can certainly find plenty of laymen/not-in-the-know folks making those kinds of comments, often in non-technical spaces. Often the worst parts of the internet where di
55.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
... You did not speak to the key point at all and went on some massive rambling incoherent political commentary. I feel this comment is unworthy of the thread. Native Sparse Attention matters. Your commentary is beneath this paper.
56.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
Do not try to signal intelligence by being sardonic or intentionally being obtuse. Actively avoiding the point someone is making rather than confronting it head on is beneath you. ChatGPT o1 was made generally available in December 2024 Dee
57.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
Thank you so much for sharing your story. It is never easy to admit mistakes or problems, but we are all just human. AI-induced psychosis seems to be a trending issue, and presents a real problem. I was previously very skeptical as well abo
58.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
Yea I agree. It’s sad to find so much of the comments are focused on reinventing reality and jingoism instead of scientific discussion on the merits and technicals. I’ll return tomorrow and hope for better comments.
59.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
Yes that’s what makes it so interesting and novel you nailed it
60.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
OAI and others were already on their way there or released the models. How did you manage to convince yourself that High Flyer did it first ? And that everyone else copied from them post-hoc? You’ve created a new chain of causality that sim

More ›