laughingcurve

11 ms·

61.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
… wait did you just seriously tell SamA that he’s an asshole because of copyright issues… while praising Chinese labs who couldn’t give a rat fuck and won’t follow the same laws? Or pay creators? Physician, heal thyself
62.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
Almost all of High Flyers achievements have more to do with scaling the process but when scaling is all you need, it’s darn effective
63.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
Genuinely many times it seems most people need to find reasons to assume the best about DeepSeek and China in order to confirm their prior bias that “America bad” and “Capital is evil”. The reality is grey and fuzzy, with neither side landi
64.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
Lysenkoism destroyed the sciences for USSR. Stalin picked the crony himself. If your problem is “I don’t like people using bad men as comparison points” maybe you can point to someone who was a good person but still intentionally went out o
65.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
okhat is a great way to shorten your name gave me a good laugh
66.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
It’s not clear to me how this is a data breach at all. Did the researchers hack into some database and steal information? No? Because afaik everything they collected was public web. So now researchers are being lambasted for having data in
67.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
Don’t worry, until you’re chewing on your foot mid lecture, you’re good
68.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
Glad someone else said all this so I did not have to. Hats off to you
69.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
“I don’t think you should pay others for something you can’t master without [paying].” is one a hell of an argument to make. Good luck trying.
70.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
“I do not like the results!” Or “The result does not make sense to me!” are not valid criticisms of science. They are arguments made from emotion. And in your case, based on your account history, it’s clearly something political for you. I
71.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
Random numbers ?? Please stop showing your ignorance here because you have some weird bias against a technology. The utter contempt and dismissiveness of folks on this site is astounding.
72.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
Your imagination is pretty bad then
73.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
In every conflict ? Or just in a lot of them
74.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
I know ! the problem is that when a product is so good that it converts people into evangelicals about it With that said — it’s uv or die for me
75.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
Great work and a wonderful presentation
76.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
Together Compute SFCompute And so on … definitely not out of trend
77.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
Super odd experience seeing Palantir and Anthropic partnering up in DC this week to sell services to the military.
78.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
Thank god someone bothered to explain it to HN. As someone getting a PhD at a top school and the first in my family to ever make it past high school I can assure you all these kids are raised from birth in a test tube by their parents.
79.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
Already exists in the current literature
80.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
Very good point, and I agree completely. My source: Warhammer 40,000
81.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
It’s really obvious you did not read anything in the article. It’s a victim impact statement. It’s not being used as evidence. State law allows for victim impact statements to be delivered in any manner. A family is grieving and looking for
82.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
As someone who voted against Donald Trump... Saying that is just hardcore cope and not relevant to the thread / original post.
83.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
Respectfully, have you confused 'trade deficit' and 'budget deficit' similar to Trump? Being a net importer is not the same as having the governments outlays exceed it's inlays. Conservatives rightly used to be conc
84.
by laughingcurve 1y ago
It’s pretty clear from this blogpost that Larry Sanger has abandoned a pursuit of truth and neutral point of view and instead does not like how reality fails to conform to his personal biases and preferences about the way the world is.
85.
by laughingcurve 2y ago
From your lips to Jassy's ears
86.
by laughingcurve 2y ago
Schrödinger's politics
87.
by laughingcurve 2y ago
I’m genuinely hoping there’s something that pushes the AI/ML academic community off the site but until that happens it’s one of the better places to discover info
88.
by laughingcurve 2y ago
Not new, not notable right now, not sure why it's getting upvoted (just kidding, it's because people see YLC and upvote based on names)
89.
by laughingcurve 2y ago
You should have just accepted you don't have a good response and walked away. This is really unbecoming.
90.
by laughingcurve 2y ago
Society has the problem, not the individuals.

More ›