latency-guy2

11 ms·

91.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
Holding back capable people from reaching their potential is a unique kind of evil to me. It's not even about giving them more resources, but the taking away that infuriates me. The single most valuable thing a child can have is curios
92.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
Which ones? I know a few countries with those qualities, some of them filter out the bad students really early on or into another stream of education (typically slower, lower quality), as in before you're 9, not 20.
93.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
I would generally agree - but effectively, government does have control of the internet, at least the cables that run underground in their portion of the world, and even moreso the bits and bytes that travel along those wires that travel in
94.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
Tell me explicitly what the difference between 1 person and 100 people are. What happens to their rights when you go from 1 to 1,000,000, what you can strip from them when you go from 1 to 335,893,238. Enumerate specifically at which number
95.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
I feel your pain, I haven't been in ML world directly for a few years now but I've done the same exercise multiple times. The worst part is that block compression actually does not help if it doesn't do a significantly good j
96.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
Satan is canonical for one thing in particular out of most things - he does not like humanity. Getting sent there isn't a fun field trip where you get to hang out with your buddies/partners in crime after the game is over, presuma
97.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
Its true, the only real winners is the lawyers. No change has been made to the legal process. No change in laws either. If another judge happens to cite this particular case in other situations, then only maybe its a win, but unlikely consi
98.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
These people are terrorists to my email filters, what can I do to make their behavior really hurt?
99.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
Its far more than just being scammed by button pusher #300 at FB to me. All of Big Tech are active targets of very seriously motivated people attempting to get the gourd of information each of these companies collect. And many times they su
100.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
Well, revealing my previous employer, Microsoft, many devs there love oh-my-posh for whatever reason. I have no idea if its still the case anymore but I distinctly remember it being a thing for a few dev-div repos for a while, definitely in
101.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
Build systems - no. The people who maintain the build systems - yes. You might see them add a script here or there that ends up being "critical", either for telemetry/logging or investigating state at some stage of a build. I
102.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
I have an extremely rational hatred of this software. Not a typo or a misunderstanding of the phrase "irrational hatred". I will go out of my way to delete this from a codebase. I will go out of my way to block the url to github,
103.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-15/section-772.1 https://www.federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/chapter-3-propert... We have no trouble defining what things are and often do. Granted we don&#x
104.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
> What if a candidate said $110k? Would you still offer them $160k if you felt they were worth that? Or would you take advantage of this newfound information and offer them less than what you thought the job was worth to you? I will answ
105.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
> But thanks to longer working hours Average amount of time spent working has trended downwards for nearly every income group for every decade except at best the last decade where it's been stabilizing around ~33 to 36 hours a week
106.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
Can you establish further what you mean? This is at odds to me considering who staffs the federal agencies and subsequently who gets the enforce the laws.
107.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
This reads more like interpretation is at fault rather than the actual ruling. The SC ruled in favor of the state(s), as in the fining for that reason is not unconstitutional or an overreach.
108.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
Is the arbitrage opportunity worth it? It doesn't seem like it is considering the limiting factor being the court system, and you can't really arbitrage off cheaply off miniscule enough violations to profit more than a few one off
109.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
But a lot of people in government, even among the EC consists of what is effectively lifers. I don't think citing "outsiders" as the culprit is accurate. The person who introduced CSAR most recently has been in high governmen
110.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
I don't get that sense at all from Germans, since we're citing some stereotypes, my view on it was that Germans "love" the bureaucracy, and they continue to accumulate it. The USA is anti-government and authority, fundam
111.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
Alright, have the "constructive intelligent debate", things that have already been mentioned in this thread: purpose of fines, proportionality, coercing behavior. I'll offer my own topic: tyranny, and how it deserves to be st
112.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
Test your theory in your new profession as lawyer, or judge if that's your prerogative, sometime soon in court. Personally, if I was in power I would disbar you immediately and pray that you never offer legal advice again.
113.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
I've never had an X account, and I was able to view the tweet pretty much instantly, page load was <80ms. Of course, can't see the subtweets like I could in years past
114.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
I'll take that bet, put money on it otherwise your words are meaningless.
115.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
You have to breath in mere seconds after you breath out, this action must continue until your bodily functions completely fail or otherwise.
116.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
I'm not confused at all about the concept. Your stance is incomplete. "Rule of law" does not stand alone either, you've also mixed in a few concepts that frankly do not apply, but we'll ignore that for now. "Ru
117.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
What is the confusion? You're the one bringing up "rule of law" as if I live to be the government's personal slave along with millions of others.
118.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
Only if you're under the false premise of the people serving the government rather than the government serves the people.
119.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
It's a long winded insult assuaged by a meme phrase at the end to not appear as one, I wouldn't treat it as anything more, what you've said is pretty apt though.
120.
by latency-guy2 2y ago
You assert a lot of personal opinions. On top of bad "characterizations" of people who are not you. I don't think this is a signature of a person being honest, or trustworthy.

More ›