lambda

36 ms·

1.
by lambda 8d ago
I have not. It's something that I've considered, but never actually have done it.
2.
by lambda 8d ago
No, it's down again: https://xcancel.com/ They did come back for a while after the original cease and desist, but they've shut off again "due to a new development in the ongoing legal proceedings" a few
3.
by lambda 10d ago
For those without X accounts (now that Nitter an XCancel are down): https://archive.ph/GQLvx
4.
by lambda 11d ago
There are LLMs that support audio input, similar to those with vision support. From my testing of open weights LLMs with audio support, they basically are only trained to recognize audio as an alternative to text input, they treat audio as
5.
by lambda 13d ago
Thanks for the follow up, I do appreciate it.
6.
by lambda 17d ago
While you can't necessarily prove it, you can say whether the data was in the training set at all. You can also do something like a release of a GPT-OSS v2, where you actually release training data and checkpoints, and do an experiment
7.
by lambda 18d ago
But you can say (with the cooperation of the parties involved, of course) if any of the preliminary work that the other researchers did was part of the dataset. It is possible to be more transparent than you are being. Even better would be
8.
by lambda 18d ago
> (1) We'd have to identify their chats. How would we do this? We'd need them to share their chats with us so we could look for matches. According to the statement by Tristan Buckmaster, he was in communication by email and cal
9.
by lambda 18d ago
Sure. But it's possible to say: if the document isn't in the training data, it isn't the cause of the output. If it is in the training data, the question gets more complicated.
10.
by lambda 18d ago
> it's not something that's feasible for us to prove one way or the other. This kind of question is exactly what a company named _Open_AI and founded as a nonprofit is supposed to be doing; open research on AI that helps inform
11.
by lambda 18d ago
So, one way to prove that the data played no part is to trace and show that it wasn't used in the training process at all. If the data was never used in training, then it couldn't have played a part in the training process. You&#x
12.
by lambda 18d ago
Yeah, I'm sure it's completely automated. But that doesn't preclude being able to index and track what the sources of data are. For your data sets, I would hope you are including source information for where the data came fro
13.
by lambda 18d ago
Why can't they rule it out? Is even OpenAI unable to track the provenance of all of their training data? This is one of the major problems with these enormous closed models, and even most open-weights models, which don't disclose
14.
by lambda 20d ago
The Italian government is also a far-right government like the US, so is aligned in wanting to suppress left-wing views.
15.
by lambda 22d ago
Weights are up: https://huggingface.co/collections/IFM/k2-horizon It's the training code that is not up yet, but this group has a history of publishing code so I would expect it, though of course you can neve
16.
by lambda 22d ago
And by "learned how to play the whole politics game", you mean "giving money to Donald Trump": https://www.sfgate.com/tech/article/brockman-openai-top-trum...
17.
by lambda 22d ago
Looks like we're still waiting on that, they have placeholder repos but haven't populated them yet: * https://github.com/ifm-ai/xllm * https://github.com/ifm-ai/horizon-post-train Their
18.
by lambda 1mo ago
Huh, when I tried it WASD didn't work like I expected, hence I went back and checked and saw that it was ZQSD. Looks like they might have fixed it now since I posted. Either that or the lagginess caught me up; it takes a second before
19.
by lambda 1mo ago
Yeah, the problem is, someone has to start the union. It takes work. You have to get the whole workforce to vote on it. A lot of software engineers believe (or believed) that they were too smart and professional to need a union. And of cour
20.
by lambda 1mo ago
I don't know that unions would necessarily negotiate for no use of AI. The SAG-AFRA deals don't preclude all use of AI; they just requre consent and negotiation in certain cases. A union doesn't give you unilateral power; it
21.
by lambda 1mo ago
Many screen and voice actors are unionized, and the unions have been striking and bargaining specifcially over these points. For example: https://sites.suffolk.edu/jhtl/2025/10/30/game-over-for-unau... S
22.
by lambda 1mo ago
I'm not just trying to score points about whether he sucks, but specifically point out the types of policies that he advocates for, and there are a number of people in this thread trying to claim somehow that he doesn't advocate f
23.
by lambda 1mo ago
Tried out the simulator and was surprised to find that the movement keys are ZQSD; then realized that's the equivalent of WASD on an AZERTY keyboard. Checked and sure enough, Pollen Robotics is a French company. They may want to at lea
24.
by lambda 1mo ago
1. Oracle 2. Microsoft 3. Google Are probably the worst of the realistic options for acquiring HuggingFace
25.
by lambda 1mo ago
He uses a word that is a slur for the Romani, an ethnic minority in many European countries. He never discusses nationality. He also compares deporting them (to where, you might ask) to shooting wolves. It's also not his only post on t
26.
by lambda 1mo ago
Nvidia releases some of the most open open weights models, Nemotron 3, which have the full training code open, and most but not all of the training datasets. Nvidia is a big company. They are good about some things and bad about others. I t
27.
by lambda 1mo ago
The word he uses is a pejorative for the Romani, an ethnicity.
28.
by lambda 1mo ago
Just to explain because not everyone is necessarily a native English speaker or gets the reference. This is a reference to a dog whistle. Above 25kHz are sounds that dogs can hear but humans generally can't. The term dog whistle is use
29.
by lambda 1mo ago
He literally calls openly for the ethnic cleansing of undesirable populations from Europe. Just read his blog. There's no subtlety or nuance.
30.
by lambda 1mo ago
Better than Olmo in performance, not quite as open; release some, but not all, of their datasets.

More ›