lajamerr

14 ms·

31.
by lajamerr 4y ago
Maybe for Starlink as a spun off company. But not SpaceX. That's his passion project. He would want to make sure he's in majority control the entire time.
32.
by lajamerr 4y ago
There's all kinds of people in this world and we can all live and have incompatible ideas. Just as you have your position and defend it, so will I. This clash of ideals of various parties I believe helps bring out the ideal solution ev
33.
by lajamerr 4y ago
I have no opinion on whether this particular college punishment is equal to the crime. I was responding to that one poster on the merits of punishing more significantly for crimes to deter other unrelated future people who may or may not co
34.
by lajamerr 4y ago
So you should be punished for a crime for more than the harm/compensation/individual deterrence, just so that you can stop future crimes by unrelated people by you being a peg that others can consider if they might commit a simila
35.
by lajamerr 4y ago
And size is already calculated in with the idea of deterring others based on sentencing guidelines.
36.
by lajamerr 4y ago
I agree with everything you said except the last sentence. Why should the punishment for the crime be increased to be used as a deterrent for others? Add a deterrence but only make the deterrence with the intention/scope of the individ
37.
by lajamerr 4y ago
Punish those individuals when the time comes, punish them for the equal amount of crime they caused. Don't add additional punishment in order to add a deterrence for others. You should not punish people to stop the future actions of un
38.
by lajamerr 4y ago
There's nothing wrong with big punishments if it meets the crimes. But I shouldn't have disproportionate punishment so that my case can be used as taglines/references on "you could get this huge big punishment so don&#x2
39.
by lajamerr 4y ago
Deterrence for the individual is fine only if it's made with sole intention/consideration of that individual. Additional punishment added on to deter unrelated future parties is not fine. I am not responsible for the future people
40.
by lajamerr 4y ago
Lawyers are sophisticated bunch they know these amounts will garner taglines. Do you honestly believe that these lawyers/judges don't incorporate public perception into their accounts of what they think a fitting punishment is and
41.
by lajamerr 4y ago
Why should my punishment be more severe because you want to stop others from doing something in the future? That's a disproportionate amount of punishment for the individual. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not have an additio
42.
by lajamerr 4y ago
There's a clear difference between deterring a individual and putting a amount so high it will get taglines so people will pay attention and think that could happen to them as well if they were to commit a similar crime and get caught.
43.
by lajamerr 4y ago
ASICs/Google TPU like things for AI inference/training will be easy to replicate and will have 95% of the power of existing solutions or maybe even improvements. Because they are simple in design. As far as dedicated GPUs. There i
44.
by lajamerr 4y ago
Honestly I'm not very keen on pinning blame/monetary responsibility on single individuals/companies to 'prevent/deter' unknown future crimes. We shouldn't be signaling with big punishments bigger than the
45.
by lajamerr 4y ago
I wonder if there's room for model caching. Sacrifice some personalization for near similar results so you aren't hitting the model so often.
46.
by lajamerr 4y ago
Excert from the email about the differences between the previous course. >The Machine Learning Specialization is designed to be accessible for first-time learners and includes: >An expanded list of topics that focus on the most import
47.
New Machine Learning Specialization by Andrew Ng Is Now Available on Coursera(coursera.org)
13 points by lajamerr 4y ago|2 comments
48.
by lajamerr 4y ago
Maybe your company/service can be the middle-man. Offer varying levels of checks that are optional for the employer to require or the Contractor to fill out. Identity as a service. Have things like "This person is authorized to wo
49.
by lajamerr 4y ago
Why would they need to be heterosexual to successfully procreate. If the future is designer babies/baby incubation pods. It doesn't matter what sexual orientation the kid is. The parent would have a designer baby, then why would t
50.
by lajamerr 4y ago
That energy efficiency was paid for by the total energy of the biological chain of events that eventually led to that human in the form of their DNA. We humans don't start from a blank/random slate like ANNs when we are born. We m
51.
by lajamerr 4y ago
From the Abstract *Large language models such as GPT-3 and PaLM have shown remarkable performance in few-shot learning. However, they still struggle with reasoning tasks such as the arithmetic benchmark GSM8K. Recent advances deliberately g
52.
DiVeRSe - On the Advance of Making Language Models Better Reasoners(arxiv.org)
2 points by lajamerr 4y ago|1 comments
53.
by lajamerr 4y ago
:P I assumed anyone reading it would know Opus is an Audio-codec. Was comparing the paradigm of where I see image codecs going with a similar one that happened in audio.
54.
by lajamerr 4y ago
The future isn't here yet unfortunately. I imagine the doctors would view these images in multitudes of ways(browsers, operating systems, image viewers) with varying level of support. So encoding in a standard that is yet to be entirel
55.
by lajamerr 4y ago
JPEG XL supports 24-bit integers/32-bit floats per channel.
56.
by lajamerr 4y ago
No, it's not a document format. JPEG XL won't replace TIFFs by and large because it has a different use case. TIFFs are more in-line with a combination of FLAC/WAV from the audio world. It's meant for raw data used in pr
57.
by lajamerr 4y ago
JPEG XL is the standard to beat them all. Like how Opus became the definitive codec for lossy compression for the web. JPEG XL covers nearly every use case for images, even replacing GIFs with it's animation support. Existing JPEGs can
58.
by lajamerr 4y ago
I really like that GPT3 translation, it seems to flow a lot better just reading wise and doesn't make me pause. Is there a dedicated GPT3 translation service?
59.
by lajamerr 4y ago
That makes significantly more sense. This is what human translators came up with. "I was a thirty-four-year-old man with no job and nowhere to live. I was a nice guy, but I was on the heavy side, didn't have good looks going for m
60.
by lajamerr 4y ago
I've been following machine translation for the past 8 years or so just as a consumer and I still haven't found anything that provides out-of-the-box good results, everything requires still heavy manual editing/complete rewri

More ›