l33tman

21 ms·

271.
by l33tman 4y ago
He doesn't answer the question, he writes a meandering 20k word blog post where every 5 paragraphs he assumes nobody else understands parts just because he doesn't and writes that "nobody knows" etc. Very annoying style
272.
by l33tman 4y ago
The big improvement in the chatgpt integrated by bing is that it can take today's search results into the chat to analyze seamlessly (after all, Bing already has all the search results cached internally). ChatGPT as it stands has old k
273.
by l33tman 4y ago
FWIW, the guy who wrote this article, Ryan Graves, is one of the aviators who flew and witnessed these, in addition to David Frevor (also mentioned elsewhere in this thread). Ryan was interviewed by Lex Fridman, a very good talk I think tha
274.
by l33tman 4y ago
"If it does, then that data was indispensable for generating the output for that prompt." It gets murkier than this, by far. The diffusion models are not just trained on images, but on text. It varies by implementation but Stable
275.
by l33tman 4y ago
For physics, I noted that physics.stackexchange.com, which worked fine 10 years ago, was only filled with noise now and no answers. Then I realized people who usually answered stuff there moved to Discord servers and other sites. Maybe some
276.
by l33tman 4y ago
For the second question, yeah exactly, as long as you've trained the rest of the system to a certain degree you can certainly do one-shot training on top of that now already for object recognition for example and you would be able to d
277.
by l33tman 4y ago
Yeah, I do agree with you on these points. What to do about it though, if anything... I'm fairly liberal personally, and I guess this is where pure political subjective desires will come into play. In the US you'd trust people to
278.
by l33tman 4y ago
Any Fivr artist who get a $5 would gladly paint anything you ask them. The bulk of the paid "artistry" that's in the line of fire here is probably not the most ethical of the bunch.. Regardless, as with the status quo before,
279.
by l33tman 4y ago
That wasn't the question. The question was if the learning process itself is violating any existing copyright laws.
280.
by l33tman 4y ago
The processes seem pretty alike to me (as a neuroscientist and AI researcher). Things will only move on from here, the next generation of these tools won't use a training set of 5B images and complicated month long training procedures,
281.
by l33tman 4y ago
I had absolute zero interest in digital art before, now I have some and would at least react to the artists often mentioned in prompts. They didn't get any money from me before, but the chance is > 0.0 now at least, I might at some
282.
by l33tman 4y ago
"SIT involved 3x20-second 'all-out' cycle sprints (~500W) interspersed with 2 minutes of cycling at 50W, whereas MICT involved 45 minutes of continuous cycling at ~70% maximal heart rate (~110W). Both protocols involved a 2-m
283.
by l33tman 4y ago
For Stable Diffusion I think the average number of bits in the model compared to the number of training images is in the order of 6-8 bits per image. There is no "storage" of the training images. It's 250 TB data in, and 1.4
284.
by l33tman 4y ago
While I agree with the dystopic projection, I strongly disagree with your notion that the AI image gens are not creative. I've used them for more than 6 months and am amazed every day I use them what creativity they display. I don&#x27
285.
by l33tman 4y ago
What I meant was, if the copyright holder puts it in a public place, copyright won't hinder others from viewing it, I'd hope at least... which is analogous to putting your .jpg on your web page for general consumption.
286.
by l33tman 4y ago
IANAL but copyright allows you to control the reproducing medium, in the case of DRM this would be the digital files. It doesn't allow you to control the ideas presented in the medium, so copyright alone cannot restrict you showing the
287.
by l33tman 4y ago
To quote from High Fidelity: "How can it be bullshit to state an opinion?" :) FWIW I agree, I thought the movie was boring when it came out. After all there were hundreds of other cooler movies around that time. Same with the brea
288.
by l33tman 4y ago
The killer feature with ChatGPT is that you can interactively refine a result. Your skill as a writer for a magazine for example now can be that you're good at recognizing good writing and can articulate how it can be made better, but
289.
by l33tman 4y ago
As a side-note, increasing margins is not the only way to gain revenue, you can increase the market as well. This is what they have been trying all along with all their parallel products. It was very successful with Android, less so with th
290.
by l33tman 4y ago
Probably the re-boot of The Blues Brothers. Even ChatGPT suggested that :) >What movie is where police vehicles are dispatched and they all crash for seemingly no reason on the way to a scene The movie you are describing sounds like &quo
291.
by l33tman 4y ago
I gladly recommend Alex Ball's high quality free documentary on youtube about Roland. It's not guitar-effect focused (mostly the synths and drum machines) but it shows the many branches of Roland's products over the years. h
292.
by l33tman 4y ago
My guess is that they already have the front-facing camera so someone suggested they can cut costs by removing the IR sensor and "just write some AI" for it. Likewise the stalk is a cost saving. They also removed the ultrasonic pa
293.
by l33tman 4y ago
Yeah well that they omit a windshield wiper stalk is also idiotic and furthermore outright dangerous. I've done overtakes next to trailers some times in heavy rain where in a second I had to hit the wiper stalk to max. Relying on their
294.
by l33tman 4y ago
Many of the competitors are STILL building on an ICE chassis and stuff batteries where the center axle would have been etc. When enough of them finally switch to pure EV platforms things will quickly improve I guess. But designing a new cha
295.
by l33tman 4y ago
Apparently there can be interference effects between two beams (4th order interference) so maybe such an effect could show up in this case. See Ghosh/Mandel 1987 "Observation of Nonclassical Effects in the Interference of Two Phot
296.
by l33tman 4y ago
Very funny :)
297.
by l33tman 4y ago
To be fair, this only works for simple commands like "Show me 3 arguments for and against bla bla". As soon as you ask "which of X and Y is better", there will be bias. Should it relate to the number of web pages suggest
298.
by l33tman 4y ago
That does not follow. I was in the market for an EV and considered a Tesla and now I just get a bad feeling when I see one. I have many friends who think the same and it's 100% to do with Musk, as I associated him with the brand as do
299.
by l33tman 4y ago
I guess it's a question of effort on the side of the person doing the trojan - if enough suckers just copy those snippets regularly you can be lazy and just do it like that, you don't need to go through the hassle of creating fake
300.
by l33tman 4y ago
Yeah it is incredibly much more computationally expensive when you consider it's a quantum mechanics universe and not a Newtonian, as all possible updates and combination of updates needs to be calculated and all considered together to

More ›