Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
l33t2328
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
23 ms
·
211.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
> cortisone rush This is such an outstanding term. Sometimes I’ll see a comment of someone arguing with me or insulting me and I’ll get a spike of anger and literally feel my eyes twitch for a split second and I’ve never really thought a
212.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
You’d prefer we made our code as hard to read as possible to increase job security?
213.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
What an on-the-nose example of victim blaming
214.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
> And the other way around of course. Whaaat? Are you saying there exist molecules which are very harmful in a (much) lower dose, but are beneficial at a higher dose? Do you have any examples?
215.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
> do we tolerate the existence of the US state anymore This is a ridiculous thing to say. I mean, what are you proposing? The whole world sanction the US?
216.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
Well, there was a long report about it that came to that conclusion, so
217.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
He is saying that the West doesn’t teach “real” mathematics in highschool.
218.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
Comparing the level of these traits present in online moderators to the level of these traits present in SEALs is inexplicable.
219.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
> any comparison to SEALs must be based upon physical prowess Since items an inherently physical job, it makes sense. We all agree computers are important. That doesn’t make the comparison less ridiculous.
220.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
> Some of the work done by Navy SEALs literally does involve things done sitting at computers It also involves them being fed and having their equipment maintained. Comparing the jobs is risible.
221.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
> are directly part of the SEAL structure. So are the people that serve them food > big military specops dudes have nothing to do with weak nerdy computer stuff, lol! No one is saying that. Everyone is aware of the role computers have
222.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
So is serving them food during training and sewing their uniforms. Being essential to their job doesn’t make them comparable jobs.
223.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
I think it’s a little funny you said that >[the explanation in the OP] will make sense to physicist, but no sense to most everyone else, including mathematicians And then went on to describe tensors in a way that is unfriendly to non mat
224.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
You shouldn’t have to read the code to understand what a program does, from an external POV at least.
225.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
Spivak is a better analysis book than Abbot.
226.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
Respectfully, intro physics mentions nothing about ICE operating most efficiently at 50 MPH.
227.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
See, I’ve heard that, but I like being challenged. I like to have to “pause and ponder” as the excellent Youtuber 3Blue1Brown puts it, but Vertiassium is just annoying.
228.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
Something about Veritasium absolutely rubs me the wrong way, and I generally like Youtube education creators, but his videos are borderline unwatchable for me. Does anyone have an explanation for what it is about his videos that is so grati
229.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
As he demanded countries meet their NATO obligations and chastised Germany for becoming dependent on Russian energy...right
230.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
As the ruble crashes and protests go off daily...
231.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
I’ve heard this many times, but I’ve never actually seen it cited.
232.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
Is it actually tensor products? I thought it was some multilinear map that factors through the tensor product, but my knowledge is limited.
233.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
> That's how you end up with a "tank detection AI" that in reality just classifies the weather into bright vs. dark. It seems to me the lack of knowledge was not knowing to use a diverse sample set, not some lack of mathem
234.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
Yep, what about it?
235.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
This sentiment tends to really ruffle feathers around here and I don’t understand why.
236.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
When did I say anything about (not) protecting people? Who’s talking about illegal stuff?
237.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
> For example, they take screenshots of what you watch on your Samsung Televisions This really doesn’t bother me at all.
238.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
Of course it doesn’t. We’re talking about who is doing what today.
239.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
I’m not sure if this is a serious question, but what would this imaginary law say? The government can only do business with companies who aren’t in it for the money?
240.
▲
by
l33t2328
5y ago
Some RCE can require user interaction.
More ›