Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
l0b0
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
24 ms
·
271.
▲
by
l0b0
4y ago
If it's cheap enough, it'll be just like email spam - basically everywhere worth influencing in any way will be flooded. And it'll be much harder to filter than email. One possible solution would be to change basically any co
272.
▲
by
l0b0
4y ago
That's basically the Western story of the devil, more relatably portrayed as Sauron during the second age, giving gifts and teaching people, all the while sprinkling the teachings with heretical thoughts until, many generations later,
273.
▲
by
l0b0
4y ago
There are perfectly valid reasons to downvote AI answers, no matter the content: - Whoever submitted the question very likely doesn't understand the question well enough to answer it themselves, so any feedback is not going to get a re
274.
▲
by
l0b0
4y ago
That's not suspicious, getting ~130 reputation in a day is not at all unusual.
275.
▲
by
l0b0
4y ago
I'm wondering whether the @Troppen answers to [1] are AI-generated: - Posted from a new account 8 minutes after I posted the question. - Clippy-style "It looks like you're trying to […]" intro. - Zero formatting on the i
276.
▲
by
l0b0
4y ago
I fully expect new sites¹ to become invite-only to avoid this sort of thing. If anyone is strongly suspected of degrading the quality of the site, they, and everyone they invited, are banned, and will have to get a new invite. ¹ Old sites
277.
▲
by
l0b0
4y ago
Must be the first time I've agreed with every point in such a list. Is the company still in business though? Looks like the site is broken in several ways in both Firefox and Chromium.
278.
▲
by
l0b0
4y ago
You're both right, but not all languages give you the choice. And a lot of types are implemented badly. For example as a subclass of a number class, so that `amountDollars + timeSeconds` and other nonsensical statements aren't err
279.
▲
by
l0b0
4y ago
Do you need to `git config notes.rewriteRef refs/notes/commits`[1]? [1] https://stackoverflow.com/a/14601464/96588
280.
▲
by
l0b0
4y ago
Every "why" question on the Internet contains at least one wrong assumption. Here's yet another data point.
281.
▲
by
l0b0
4y ago
Good article, but the "Bullshit Industry?" section doesn't fit with the rest. Adtech is pure evil as far as I'm concerned, but that is orthogonal to whether it's pointless. A pointless adtech job might be to add &
282.
▲
by
l0b0
4y ago
At this point Web N is is basically just snappy advertising for a bundle of concepts which was useful precisely one time in history: Web 2.0. [This is the space where I'd love to write a long message about why it was important, why it
283.
▲
by
l0b0
4y ago
Yeah, right now signal/noise for this statement is huge, because IMO at most 50% of people (likely much less, only the kind of people who are more used to graphs than mountains) who have a good grasp of English but have never heard t
284.
▲
by
l0b0
4y ago
Is there some way to stage individual lines? I do this all the time, and `git gui` seems to be the only tool which does this in a sensible way (right-click a line or selection to stage/unstage it). `git add --patch` is far too much man
285.
▲
by
l0b0
4y ago
IMO, since they're not suggesting anything better they are not helping. It's like telling people "just don't do that if it's causing problems". Well, what's the alternative? We still have this concept we n
286.
▲
by
l0b0
4y ago
The "steep learning curve" entry is bizarre. Is it so difficult to envision that it's a straightforward analogue to real life? Climbing a steep mountain (that is, a steep slope or curve), if you manage (since a difficult trav
287.
▲
by
l0b0
4y ago
Yep, it's the classic self-fulfilling prophecy. Even a lot of non-techies are aware that there are multiple browsers, and will just switch to whichever gets the job done. So if you're seeing less % of any specific browser than the
288.
▲
by
l0b0
4y ago
Using your suggestion I ended up with the following for a Canon 7D: services.udev.extraRules = '' ACTION=="add", \ ATTR{idVendor}=="04a9", \ ATTR{idProduct}=="319a", \ ENV{SYSTEMD_
289.
▲
by
l0b0
4y ago
WTF. 5/6 on Haskell despite having barely touched it 10+ years ago. Pretty descriptive signatures, although the function names could do with some clarification.
290.
▲
by
l0b0
4y ago
Interesting! Got an account, but I wonder how you/we are going to pay for it. Even with just a few million bookmarks you're going to need a non-trivial DB setup, and (according to some napkin maths on my Pinboard account) ~2.5 MB
291.
▲
by
l0b0
4y ago
Follow-up: Weirdly, it seems the backend for the archive feature is working fine - it's reporting what looks like a correct number of bookmarks, and says the backup is currently 51 GB, up from 30 GB when I last downloaded in July 2020.
292.
▲
by
l0b0
4y ago
The archiving happens automatically; you shouldn't need to do anything except request an archive backup[1]. Unfortunately those requests are not honoured, and haven't been for a long time (my last successful backup was in July 202
293.
▲
by
l0b0
4y ago
As a power user (21k bookmarks, 16k tags) I'm sorry to see Pinboard dying. I don't want any more features, but the killer feature introduced a few years, ago, archiving, is long dead: > You asked to download your archive on
294.
▲
by
l0b0
4y ago
Is there a reasonably neutral comparison of Mathics vs Mathematica anywhere? Based on an amazing showcase[1] Mathematica is right at the top of my list of languages to learn if it (and at least some of the surrounding tooling) ever becomes
295.
▲
by
l0b0
4y ago
I don't remember anything about artifacts; I just went to the web page and there were no further buttons to click to continue playing - I'd have to reset.
296.
▲
by
l0b0
4y ago
I've played through UP twice. When it comes to time sinks, it's nowhere near the ultimate death spiral that is Kittens Game. To date it has taken me about 5 times as long as a UP playthrough (and 500+ lines of JS automation which
297.
▲
Kittens Game – a Dark Souls of incremental gaming
(kittensgame.com)
2 points
by
l0b0
4y ago
|
0 comments
298.
▲
by
l0b0
4y ago
> The time needed to verify that the result is exactly what I expected can take 15-20 mins. If the verification isn't automated, you're not running automated tests. So I'd add the 15-20 minutes extra to the test runtime.
299.
▲
by
l0b0
4y ago
I don't want any kind of sign-in for stuff like this. Just send me straight to the interface.
300.
▲
by
l0b0
4y ago
Totally. Guesstimating interest rates for various types of tech debt is a fun exercise: - Using a single-letter variable: 10% interest on any code which uses that variable. That is, any work involving that variable takes 10% longer than it
More ›